Ha ha. Sorry, it's too much fun calling these spades a spade and calling out these idiot righties - yes it is ALWAYS the rigties that say the stupid shit. Oh oh, is that racist?
once again you are off your meds and very confused... fc. you are mixing up at least 3 things... which all show you to be wrong... 1. 1350 peer reviewed papers which are skeptical of agw. http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html 2. CO2 is also a coolant in the atmosphere protecting the earth from warming... For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space. https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/ 3. the letter to NASA which got the head agw nutter removed... "retired" because they explained there was no science supporting your agw nutter calims. note many of these guys have far more serious bona fides in this area than your al gore sponsored website run by a cartoonist and some of the other guys on your team with the very soft degrees. http://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-scientists-dispute-climate-change-2012-4 NASA Global Warming Stance Blasted By 49 Astronauts, Scientists Who Once Worked At Agency CC: Mr. John Grunsfeld, Associate Administrator for Science CC: Ass Mr. Chris Scolese, Director, Goddard Space Flight Center Ref: Letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, dated 3-26-12, regarding a request for NASA to refrain from making unsubstantiated claims that human produced CO2 is having a catastrophic impact on climate change. /s/ Jack Barneburg, Jack – JSC, Space Shuttle Structures, Engineering Directorate, 34 years /s/ Larry Bell – JSC, Mgr. Crew Systems Div., Engineering Directorate, 32 years /s/ Dr. Donald Bogard – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 41 years /s/ Jerry C. Bostick – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 23 years /s/ Dr. Phillip K. Chapman – JSC, Scientist – astronaut, 5 years /s/ Michael F. Collins, JSC, Chief, Flight Design and Dynamics Division, MOD, 41 years /s/ Dr. Kenneth Cox – JSC, Chief Flight Dynamics Div., Engr. Directorate, 40 years /s/ Walter Cunningham – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 7, 8 years /s/ Dr. Donald M. Curry – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Leading Edge, Thermal Protection Sys., Engr. Dir., 44 years /s/ Leroy Day – Hdq. Deputy Director, Space Shuttle Program, 19 years /s/ Dr. Henry P. Decell, Jr. – JSC, Chief, Theory & Analysis Office, 5 years /s/Charles F. Deiterich – JSC, Mgr., Flight Operations Integration, MOD, 30 years /s/ Dr. Harold Doiron – JSC, Chairman, Shuttle Pogo Prevention Panel, 16 years /s/ Charles Duke – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 16, 10 years /s/ Anita Gale /s/ Grace Germany – JSC, Program Analyst, 35 years /s/ Ed Gibson – JSC, Astronaut Skylab 4, 14 years /s/ Richard Gordon – JSC, Astronaut, Gemini Xi, Apollo 12, 9 years /s/ Gerald C. Griffin – JSC, Apollo Flight Director, and Director of Johnson Space Center, 22 years /s/ Thomas M. Grubbs – JSC, Chief, Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering Branch, 31 years /s/ Thomas J. Harmon /s/ David W. Heath – JSC, Reentry Specialist, MOD, 30 years /s/ Miguel A. Hernandez, Jr. – JSC, Flight crew training and operations, 3 years /s/ James R. Roundtree – JSC Branch Chief, 26 years /s/ Enoch Jones – JSC, Mgr. SE&I, Shuttle Program Office, 26 years /s/ Dr. Joseph Kerwin – JSC, Astronaut, Skylab 2, Director of Space and Life Sciences, 22 years /s/ Jack Knight – JSC, Chief, Advanced Operations and Development Division, MOD, 40 years /s/ Dr. Christopher C. Kraft – JSC, Apollo Flight Director and Director of Johnson Space Center, 24 years /s/ Paul C. Kramer – JSC, Ass.t for Planning Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Div., Egr. Dir., 34 years /s/ Alex (Skip) Larsen /s/ Dr. Lubert Leger – JSC, Ass’t. Chief Materials Division, Engr. Directorate, 30 years /s/ Dr. Humbolt C. Mandell – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Program Control and Advance Programs, 40 years /s/ Donald K. McCutchen – JSC, Project Engineer – Space Shuttle and ISS Program Offices, 33 years /s/ Thomas L. (Tom) Moser – Hdq. Dep. Assoc. Admin. & Director, Space Station Program, 28 years /s/ Dr. George Mueller – Hdq., Assoc. Adm., Office of Space Flight, 6 years /s/ Tom Ohesorge /s/ James Peacock – JSC, Apollo and Shuttle Program Office, 21 years /s/ Richard McFarland – JSC, Mgr. Motion Simulators, 28 years /s/ Joseph E. Rogers – JSC, Chief, Structures and Dynamics Branch, Engr. Directorate,40 years /s/ Bernard J. Rosenbaum – JSC, Chief Engineer, Propulsion and Power Division, Engr. Dir., 48 years /s/ Dr. Harrison (Jack) Schmitt – JSC, Astronaut Apollo 17, 10 years /s/ Gerard C. Shows – JSC, Asst. Manager, Quality Assurance, 30 years /s/ Kenneth Suit – JSC, Ass’t Mgr., Systems Integration, Space Shuttle, 37 years /s/ Robert F. Thompson – JSC, Program Manager, Space Shuttle, 44 years/s/ Frank Van Renesselaer – Hdq., Mgr. Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters, 15 years /s/ Dr. James Visentine – JSC Materials Branch, Engineering Directorate, 30 years /s/ Manfred (Dutch) von Ehrenfried – JSC, Flight Controller; Mercury, Gemini & Apollo, MOD, 10 years /s/ George Weisskopf – JSC, Avionics Systems Division, Engineering Dir., 40 years /s/ Al Worden – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 15, 9 years /s/ Thomas (Tom) Wysmuller – JSC, Meteorologist, 5 years -
In your mind you deny statements made in congressional testimony by leading climate experts such as Dr. Curry. Amazing.
Yeah........ Darwin was a fucking geologist but you believe in evolution. Galileo never graduated college. Clearly not an expert. Leonardo da Vinci never had a science degree. Michael Faraday had no formal education. Srinivasa Ramanujan didn't even have a math degree. Totally self taught. The Wright brothers never even graduated high school. Thomas Edison only spent 3 months in high school. Steve Jobs only spend 1 year in college. Mark Zuckerberg only went to Harvard for 2 year. Clearly not an expert in social media and coding. I mean..... he doesn't even have a degree.
No publishing climate scientist denies man made global warming. They ALL know it is true. Just so we are clear. This does not include astronauts, engineers, etc. Climate experts. None deny it.
Do you know what the meaning of "deny" is? Just how fucking dumb are you? Oh wait, I'm talking to a righty. Never mind.
May New York, Tokyo, and mumbai Vaya Con Dios. West Antarctica Begins to Destabilize With ‘Intense Unbalanced Melting’ Warmer ocean water is attacking ice at its base, adding dangerously to sea-level rise. Mount Murphy (foreground) and the Crosson Ice Shelf (center left), seen from a NASA Operation IceBridge flight in October 2012. SOURCE: John Sonntag, via Nature If you want to see the future of New York, Tokyo, or Mumbai, look no further than West Antarctica, where a warmer sea is turning ice into water that may be headed to your doorstep. The bottom of the world has drawn increased scrutiny from scientists over the last few years, as West Antarctic ice loss in some places shows signs of becoming “unstoppable.” There’s enough water locked up in West Antarctica’s Amundsen Sea region alone to raise the global average sea level by four feet, and it’s the fastest-melting spot on the continent. The National Science Foundation and a U.K. counterpart last week announced that they’ll fund up to $25 million in research that will help the scientific community better understand the timing and mechanics of a critical glacier, the Thwaites. It’s basically the climate-science equivalent of an FBI “Most Wanted” poster. A study issued on Tuesday in Nature Communications measures directly just how dramatically glaciers are being gnawed at from beneath. The research focuses on those that empty into a section of the Amundsen Sea just south of the Thwaites Glacier. A significant portion of Antarctica is now subject to “intense unbalanced melting,” the authors write. This map, created for a British Antarctic Survey project, shows the location of glaciers in West Antarctica's Amundsen Sea Embayment. SOURCE: Courtesy British Antarctic Survey Everyone has heard of global warming, and most understand that letting ice melt will eventually flood coastal cities. But many may not understand how these critical parts of the globe function. In West Antarctica, for example, glaciers flow (yes, they move, albeit slowly) off the continent, toward the sea, terminating at a final “grounding line”— the extent of the ice that’s lying on bedrock. From there, a frozen sheet called an ice shelf extends into the sea. The problem, increasingly, is the sea encircling West Antarctica has warmed up and is flowing beneath those ice shelves, washing grounding lines back toward the continent. It’s as if the foundation of your house were slowly being chipped away from below. It may be only a matter of time before the structure collapses. The topography of the region isn’t helping matters. The ground beneath the glaciers sinks the farther you move inland. So when grounding lines retreat, they also descend, leaving a deeper target for warming waters to flow into and carving away additional ice. The Smith Glacier’s grounding line, for example, is now 2,100 meters below sea level, by far the deepest in its neighborhood. It’s also much more susceptible to further melt because the temperature at which frozen seawater melts drops as you descend. Scientists can see the ice retreat because of direct measurements taken in 2002, 2009, and 2014, when NASA’s Operation IceBridge flew over the area with ice-penetrating radar. The program is expected to fly the same route again this season to produce a contemporary snapshot. This NASA video provides a visual overview of West Antarctica’s Amundsen Sea glaciers. It is narrated by Eric Rignot, a scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and University of California-Irvine and a co-author of the new paper. Always concerned that their instruments might not to be sensitive enough to detect the changes they’re studying, authors of the Nature Communications paper could at least put that out of their minds. The changes in the ice surpassed their instrument’s uncertainty by a factor of 10 or 100. “Any change within a few meters probably would not have been easy to discern,” said Ala Khazendar of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the lead author, “but here we’re talking about between 300 and 500 meters in seven years.”... http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...o-destabilize-with-intense-unbalanced-melting
you realize there are over 1300 peer reviewed papers skeptical of man made global warming and you can not produce one peer reviewed paper which states man made co2 causes global warming. how intentionally stupid do you have to be to keep talking about denying when the scientists speak of being skeptical. its like you don't understand that scientists use the null hypothesis to evaluate things.
really... are you or bloomberg implicitly blaming this on man made co2? why not try a bit of science and disclose what is obviously a big factor... or the fact we have been warming since the last ice age? http://www.livescience.com/46194-volcanoes-melt-antarctic-glaciers.html Updated at 4:10 p.m. ET. Antarctica is a land of ice. But dive below the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, and you'll find fire as well, in the form of subglacial volcanoes. Now, a new study finds that these subglacial volcanoes and other geothermal "hotspots" are contributing to the melting of Thwaites Glacier, a major river of ice that flows into Antarctica's Pine Island Bay. Areas of the glacier that sit near geologic features thought to be volcanic are melting faster than regions farther away from hotspots, said Dustin Schroeder, the study's lead author and a geophysicist at the University of Texas at Aust