Didn't read it pie. Doesn't matter. Not a single expert climatologist denies AGW. Unless you are a publishing climatologist your opinion is worth the pile my dog made. Actually the pile my dog made is worth more since it will at least fertilize the lawn
You fertilize your lawn with your dogs poop? You know they do sell fertilizer at your local hardware store for such a purpose.
Pink salmon in the Pacific Ocean face a double threat of acidification linked to greenhouse gas emissions since it slows their early growth in rivers and disrupts the chemistry of seawater, a study showed on Monday... ...Carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas caused by burning fossil fuels, reacts with water to produce a weak acid. That especially threatens creatures ranging from oysters to lobsters which find it harder to build protective shells. An international study in 2013 said acidification of the oceans was happening at the fastest pace for 55 million years, because of human greenhouse gas emissions... http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/29/climatechange-salmon-idUSL5N0ZF2EY20150629
It seems the entire planet's ecosystem is progressively being put at greater risk. And that is not an applecart we can afford to upset.
the oceans and our fisheries do need protecting. instead of the billions being spent on the agw nutter liars... lets spend it on the oceans. I would also note the oceans might be getting more neutral... they are still on the base side of 7 not the acid side.
Liars? Hey jerm, did you ever find a publishing climatologist that denies man made global warming? No? Didn't think so. You do know that ignoring and downplaying one of the biggest threats to mankind is immoral right? You do consider yourself a Christian right?
LOL!!! This story is pretty good evidence that the environmental whack jobs aren't running some secretly organized campaign to destroy industry. Instead, they're individual whack jobs. No organization would put out a report like the above while simultaneously reports like this one are out: Too Many Salmon in the Sea, Pacific Study Hints James Own, National Geographic, March 31, 2014 Burgeoning numbers of pink salmon may threaten the food supply of young seabirds http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/03/140331-salmon-seabirds-pacific-fish-animals-science/ I think every scientist wants to get a good grip on a fat hind tit from the federal government. A good way is to claim that some horrible thing is going to happen to the ecology. A huge problem for environmentalists is that global warming has absorbed way too much of their efforts. But it's also absorbed too much of the public's ability to care. Other researchers have a better story. Humans are going to go extinct due to global warming, LOL. Why should we give a damn about pink salmon? The world harvests 400,000 tonnes of pink salmon per year this is tiny compared to the 100,000,000 tonnes of pork. If it went completely extinct, pink salmon just doesn't matter. I can't remember the last time I had any. And if it were going extinct, we wouldn't be reading about how there's way too much of it.