man made global warming is much broader issue. you used to argue there is science showing man made co2 is causing warming. But you realize you have zero peer reviewed science showing that.
Earth hasn’t surpassed this climate milestone in more than a million years: http://globalnews.ca/news/2969648/e...imate-milestone-in-more-than-a-million-years/
The hockey stick chart as per Gore has proven correct. Were it current it would be even higher on the right edge. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_stick_graph
Here is one of your so called experts. Arctic ice free by 2016. Another failed prediction. Blahahahahahahahaha............... Just so no to gloom and doom. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/sep/17/arctic-collapse-sea-ice Monday 17 September 2012 06.14 EDT "This collapse, I predicted would occur in 2015-16 at which time the summer Arctic (August to September) would become ice-free. The final collapse towards that state is now happening and will probably be complete by those dates".
That is an antiquated chart. Before you try a character assassination of the author, the below article was written by one of your alarmist. She fully believes in global warming and thinks current CO2 levels doom the earth to 5 degrees of warming. However, WHERE IS THE WARMING? Evolution of global temperature over the past two million years Carolyn W. Snyder Nature (2016) Received 27 January 2016 / Accepted 24 August 2016 /Published online 26 September 2016 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature19798.html
Lovelock completely reverses his position on climate change. Blahahahahha. States that climate science is a religion, CS totally unscientific, predictions based on models that weren't reliable and fatally flawed. Blahahahahahaha Some excerpts below. https://www.theguardian.com/environ...by-end-of-century-robots-will-have-taken-over His Gaia hypothesis, which contends that the earth is a single, self-regulating organism, is now accepted as the founding principle of most climate science, “Anyone who tries to predict more than five to 10 years is a bit of an idiot, because so many things can change unexpectedly.” But isn’t that exactly what he did last time we met? “I know,” he grins teasingly. “But I’ve grown up a bit since then.” Lovelock now believes that “CO2 is going up, but nowhere near as fast as they thought it would. The computer models just weren’t reliable. In fact,” he goes on breezily, “I’m not sure the whole thing isn’t crazy, this climate change. One is that Lovelock is right, and the models on which his former predictions were based were fatally flawed. All things being equal – “and it’s only got to take one sizable volcano to erupt and all the models, everything else, is right off the board” – “Well, it’s a religion, really, you see. It’s totally unscientific.”
Climate change is now being blamed for **spins wheel** the increase of air turbulence http://www.cleveland.com/weather/blog/index.ssf/2016/10/airline_turbulence_is_on_the_r.html
One person said it MAY, and it's going to happen pretty soon. The prediction is not far off. Within ten years. And so what? Has CO2 ceased being a greenhouse gas? Because we have raised it by 40%.
Who? What about what every climate expert and science org on earth says? Where do you get this irrelevant stuff? Your asshole? You really should stuff it back in.
He did not say May he said "WOULD". Clearly his models were wrong. Just another climate science/global warming prediction that was proven wrong from empirical evidence from fatally flawed models. Just extend prediction another 10 years = wrong.