You keep trying to change the subject, which is that there are NO respected climate scientists that deny man made global warming. If there were they would be easy for even you to find. Compare that to this list of virtually every science organization in the world saying that manmade global warming is true. http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ Jem. Just stop. It's getting trollish of you now and embarrassing.
Amusing that Jem and others provide peer reviewed paper after paper and scientist after scientist including the highly-respected heads of university climate departments .... and the best you can do is put your hands over your ears and scream "I can't hear you" like a petulant three year old.
You are such and idiot. That is not an argument when in your alternative universe you and the cartoonist are the ones determining which scientist are subjectively "respected". We have posted countless peer reviewed papers of respected scientist. You always have some completely bullshit made up excuse as to why that scientist is not respected. Everything is cherry picked in the global warming scam. It is clear that your definition of a "respected" climate scientist is that they fulling and unequivocally believe in the climate religion. If a scientist does not, you consider that scientist to be NOT respected.
There are NO publishing climate scientists that deny man made global warming and none have been presented. How does it feel when every expert on earth believes something and you don't? Don't you feel stupid? Oh wait, you're a Trumper. You're used to it. lol
Well except for Dr. Judith Curry and the long list of others who state the contribution of man to global warming is negligible and not a threat to the planet.
do you not read... fraudcurrents. If man made co2 has little influence on atmospheric co2... that destroys the idea that man made co2 is causing warming. ► CO2 released from use of fossil fuels have little influence on the observed changes in the amount of atmospheric CO2, and changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.
Just stop. No publishing expert denies man made global warming including the authors of this study. We are not Trumpers. We can read. In no way does this joke of a paper which has been roundly dismissed as statistical trash show that man made global warming is not true. So still waiting. Trolly troll of all trolls.
that is a peer reviewed paper with easily reproducible statistical results. its has received high praise by many. (last time I searched google I found only 2 or 3 nutters who had a quarrel with the paper and most of their arguments were really weak.) There have been multiple other papers producing the same results. One paper was done 20 years earlier and it came to the same conclusions. Its the data... its the facts... those are facts not subject to your bullshit. you can reproduce the same results yourself. The stats are basic. The data in the paper destroys the idea of man made global warming. Besides... no scientist on your team denies that co2 trails ocean warming and cooling.