It seems to me I've heard that song before It's from an old familiar score I know it well, that melody I know each word because I've heard that song before The lyrics said, "Forevermore" Forevermore's a memory --Sammy Cahn
Now there is an endorsement. That confirms the whole global warming scam is indeed a scam. It seems like the Catholic Church's whole reason for existence is to be on the wrong side of history.
the tides... causing warming... plenty of peer reviewed papers on that subject. man made co2 causing warming... no papers found. http://www.plantsneedco2.org/default.aspx?menuitemid=371&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
How come you nutters can't find one peer reviewed paper showing man made co2 causes warming. I though you all said all the scientists were on your side. once again here is a list of 1350 skeptical papers. http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html#Sensitivity and if you think I am bullshitting... here is a quote from Lobos Motl below about this list... and even John Cook - you know him... hes the guy running the site fraudcurrents is always citing... the one paid for by al gore. ---- "A tour de force list of scientific papers..." - Robert M. Carter, Ph.D. Environmental Scientist "Wow, the list is pretty impressive ...It's Oreskes done right." - Luboš Motl, Ph.D. Theoretical Physicist "I really appreciate your important effort in compiling the list." - Willie Soon, Ph.D. Astrophysicist and Geoscientist "...it's a very useful resource. Thanks to the pop tech team." - Joanne Nova, Author of The Skeptics Handbook I do confess a degree of fascination with Poptech's list..." - John Cook, Cartoonist at Skeptical Science again... here is a list of 1350 peer reviewded papers supporting skeptical arguments against AGW alarmism. http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html#Sensitivity
The IPCC: Who Are They and Why Do Their Climate Reports Matter? Contents Overview IPCC History and Mission The First Three Assessments IPCC Structure AR4 Products Authors, Contributors, and Reviewers The Peer Review Process Representing a Range of Expert Opinions Consensus Building within the IPCC The Role of Governments References
Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as evidenced by increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, the widespread melting ofsnow and ice, and rising global average sea level.[5] Most of the global warming since the mid-20th century is very likely due to human activities.[6] Benefits and costs of climate change for [human] society will vary widely by location and scale.[7] Some of the effects in temperate and polar regionswill be positive and others elsewhere will be negative.[7] Overall, net effects are more likely to be strongly negative with larger or more rapid warming.[7] The range of published evidence indicates that the net damage costs of climate change are likely to be significant and to increase over time.[8] The resilience of many ecosystems is likely to be exceeded this century by an unprecedented combination of climate change, associated disturbances (e.g. flooding, drought, wildfire,insects, ocean acidification) and other global change drivers (e.g. land-use change, pollution, fragmentation of natural systems, over-exploitation of resources).[9] No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these main points. The last national or international scientific body to drop dissent was the American Association of Petroleum Geologists,[10]