Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

You are a joke.

Your arguments generally consists of the below:

1. Author or authors are not qualified
2. Author or authors are paid by oil
3. the paper wasn't published in a journal that you subjectively decide isn't good enough

Now that you cannot make any of the above arguments against the recently published paper you just say they are wrong.

This unequivocally demonstrates that global warming to you has nothing to do with science. It is simply a religion that you worship.

This is exactly why people like myself are skeptical. You and your buddies are the CAUSE for skepticism of global warming.

Cherry picking data is not part of the scientific process.

 

I was totally unaware of that. Thank you.

 

correct... I recall fraudcurrents saying things like its not the sun... its only co2. he may have made other more reasonable statements... but I recall he has also taken absolute stances on this subject.

 

Simple question ....Todd


Where is the slowdown in this chart? This is the best current chart we have via NOAA and NASA the premier world authority in these matters. Simply put, there is no better chart of surface air temps of the world.

So todd, where is the slowdown?



http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/

As far as climate heat content of earth, which is really what matters, where is the slowdown?



http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/3M_HEAT_CONTENT/



There is no slowdown.

 

I NEVER stated that the current warming is even partially due to solar increase. So now you are going to tell me what I know?

 

As I predicted last year El Nino was likely to wipe out the pause. But your data sets are no longer accurate.

--
"The sharp el Niño spike is just about to abolish the long Pause in global temperatures – at least for now. This column has long foretold that the present el Niño would be substantial, and that it might at least shorten if not extinguish the Pause. After all, theory requires that some global warming ought to occur.

This month, though, the Pause clings on. Though January 2016 was the warmest January in the RSS satellite record since 1979, the El Niño spike has not yet lasted long enough to end the Pause. That will happen by next month’s report. The RSS data still show no global warming for 18 years 8 months, notwithstanding record increases in CO2 concentration over the period."


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/02/06/the-pause-hangs-on-by-its-fingernails/



The believers say there was never a Pause in the first place. After many unconvincing alterations to all of the principal global surface tamperature datasets over the two years leading up to the Paris climate conference, the Pause all the datasets once showed had been erased.

Significantly, the two satellite datasets continued to show a steadily-lengthening Pause till last month, but over the past year or two, long before the present el Niño set in, the three terrestrial datasets had already succeeded in ingeniously airbrushing it away.

The not necessarily reliable Tom Karl of NOAA and the relentlessly campaigning Gavin Schmidt of NASA held a joint press conference to celebrate the grants their rent-seeking organizations can milk out of their assertion that 2015 was the warmest year since 1880. But they carefully omitted the trend-line from their graph, so I have added it back. It shows the world warming since 1880 at an unexciting two-thirds of a degree per century:

 

I am just wondering what chart you are going to use once NOAA and NASA update/correct their charts.

 

I will use those charts. These charts are the most current and best.

I notice you are avoiding the question. Where is the slowdown?

 

..

 

...