Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

Discussion in 'Politics' started by nitro, Jun 16, 2015.

  1. jem

    jem

    1. your quote fraudcurrents is about human activities not man made co2. There is a massive difference.

    2. your 97% number was based on 95 scientists chosen out of a survey of 10000.
    Hardly any (if any) climatologists are personally on record in saying that science says man made co2 causes warming. Its the IPCC of the UN promoting that propaganda... not real scientists who have to have science to back their statements up when that make statements as individual scientists.

    Here is your quote... my underline was added.

    Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities.
     
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2016
    #1071     Feb 28, 2016
  2. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    John Cook is unqualified to even comment on Evans work.
     
    #1072     Feb 28, 2016
    gwb-trading likes this.
  3.  
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2016
    #1073     Feb 28, 2016

  4. Cook is actually more qualified to talk about climate science than the whore Evans. But we don't need Cook to tell that the guy is a petrodollar seeking fraud. One of a handful that denier morons constantly drool over with zero understanding of the science involved.

    Hell, conservatives don't even know what a greenhouse gas is.
     
    #1074     Feb 28, 2016
  5. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Cook is a self-employed cartoonist.
     
    #1075     Feb 28, 2016
    WeToddDid2 likes this.
  6. So GWB, do you know what a greenhouse gas is and what they do? I'm sure that snurfdog has no clue.
     
    #1076     Feb 28, 2016
  7. jem

    jem

    This site was created by John Cook. I'm not a climatologist or a scientist but a self employed cartoonist and web programmer by trade. I did a Physics degree at the University of Queensland and while I achieved First Class Honours and could've continued onto a PhD, I instead quit academia and became a professional scrawler. Too much doodling in lectures, I think. Nevertheless, I've pursued a keen interest in science and if anything, found my curiosity about how the world works increased once I wasn't forced to study for impending exams.

    My interest in global warming began when I drew a cartoon spoof of the TV show 24 that wondered what Jack Bauer would do if Al Gore was President and global warming was the "threat du jour". I watched An Inconvenient Truth for research which I found thought provoking although I didn't know what to make of all the science.


    http://web.archive.org/web/20080213042858/http://www.skepticalscience.com/page.php?p=3


     
    #1077     Feb 28, 2016
    WeToddDid2 likes this.
  8. Like I thought. Conservatives don't know what a greenhouse gas is or does. Amazing.

    Nothing is worse than intentional ignorance.
     
    #1078     Feb 28, 2016
  9. jem

    jem

    as I have told you many times you troll, your question is a troll non sequitor.
    greenhouse gases also cause cooling.
    It seems to depend on how much we have and where we are in the cycle.

    for instance
    in addition to the NASA I have presented many times..which says co2 in the atmosphere protects us from the the warming rays... given off during solar events..

    we have this...


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ear...-have-caused-an-ice-age-claim-scientists.html

    Researchers at the University of Birmingham found that 630 million years ago the earth had a warm atmosphere full of carbon dioxide but was completely covered with ice.

    The scientists studied limestone rocks and found evidence that large amounts of greenhouse gas coincided with a prolonged period of freezing temperatures.

    Such glaciation could happen again if global warming is not curbed, the university's school of geography, earth and environmental sciences warned.

    While pollution in the air is thought to trap the sun's heat in the atmosphere, causing the planet to heat up, this new research suggests it could also have the opposite effect reflecting rays back into space.

    This effect would be magnified by other forms of pollution in the earth's atmosphere such as particles of sulphate pumped into the air through industrial pollution or volcanic activity and could create ice age conditions once more, the scientists said.
    • Dr Ian Fairchild, lead investigator, said: "We came up with an independent test of a theory that the earth, like a baked Alaska pudding, was once hot on the outside, surrounding a cold, icy surface.

    "It happened naturally in the past, but the wrong use of technology could make it happen again."

    The limestones studied were collected in Svalbard in the Arctic Ocean, which is covered in ice and snow.


     
    #1079     Feb 29, 2016
  10. #1080     Feb 29, 2016