It doesn't matter what degree I have. What matters is what the professional climate scientists - which your whore is not - say. You may want to read a little about what the actual experts say.... Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ but you are a willfully ignorant conservative so you won't read it. Go ahead, click on the link. After that you can go to NOAA here....but you won't. https://www.climate.gov/news-featur...ate/global-warming-frequently-asked-questions
My whore? Really? I'm going to go out on a limb and speculate that you are singularly the most unpleasant person on ET. That nastified persona must win you a lot of friends and I'll bet you are surrounded by women, NOT lol. NASA? Please. Their primary mission is "muslim outreach" and they are letting Space-X, Blue Origin and Orbital Science carry their water.... and their astronauts lol. NASA has become a joke in the rocket scientist community. Trump will probably fix that and we'll likely end up sending people to Mars once NASA has been reformed. Muslim outreach. lol So back to your degree.... liberal arts is it?
Rising Sea Levels Could Cause Staggering Damage To These Cities "Sea levels may rise by about one meter by 2100 if carbon emissions continue unchecked, according to a recent survey of experts, and the effects on coastal cities could be devastating. A 2008 report from the OECD ranked the most exposed cities, identifying areas that would be exposed if sea levels rose 0.5 meters by 2070 and there was a once-in-a-century storm, accounting for larger storms in some areas (raising water an additional 0.5 meters to 1.5 meters), natural and artificial land shifts, and urban growth. Calcutta, India could be hit hardest, with 14 million people and $2.0 trillion in assets exposed in 2070 — and the problem could get even worse by 2100. Risk can be partially mitigated on a local level by flood and wind protection as well as city planning. Globally, it requires efforts to reverse rising carbon dioxide emissions, which are increasing the Earth's temperature and causing water to expand and land ice to melt into the ocean. We averaged population and asset exposure ranks to determine the cities with the most to lose. We then mapped areas of the cities that could be affected by a sea level rise of less than two meter using data and a tool from a University of Arizona study. Our findings are displayed below starting with the most exposed. It should be noted that all coastal cities are at risk, not just the ones on this list..." http://www.businessinsider.com/citi...els-2014-4?utm_source=msn&utm_medium=referral
Science First Look Did global warming 'pause'? Depends how you define 'pause' The theory that global warming paused in the 2000s was largely put to rest last year when NOAA recalculated some of its data. However, a commentary published this month has called that recalculation into question. By Christina Beck, Staff February 26, 2016 "After seemingly being put to rest last year, the controversy over a supposed “hiatus” has resurfaced, but this time with a key change in terminology that could temper the pitch of the discussion. "The idea that global warming took a hiatus in the 2000s has stoked political debate in the United States over the validity of climate models and scientists' near-universal consensus that global warming has been man-made. If a pause in global warming occurred even as global industries continued to rely on fossil fuels, then perhaps the changes seen in climate scientists could be attributed to natural variation after all, critics of climate change science have argued. "The debate would seem to have been put to rest last year, after scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) recalculated climate data to correct for known biases and found that global warming had not paused as proponents of the hiatus theory had suggested. Last November, the online science journal Scientific Reports published an article that affirmed the NOAA’s claim. "According to their research, the authors of the article stated that, “Even putting aside possible artifacts in the temperature record, there is no substantive evidence of a 'pause' or 'hiatus' in warming.” "Now, a commentary article penned by several climate scientists and published this month in the journal Nature Climate Change, takes issue with NOAA's conclusion. '“The interpretation [the NOAA group] made was not valid,” said John Fyfe, a climate scientist at Environment and Climate Change Canada. “The slowdown is there, even in this new updated data set.” '"However, there is a significant difference in Dr. Fyfe's choice of language and in the language used by global warming skeptics, Nature commentator Jeff Tolferson says. '"Fyfe uses the term 'slowdown' rather than 'hiatus' and stresses that it does not in any way undermine global-warming theory." "Fyfe and his colleagues point out a "mismatch" between climate models predictions and actual observations, but stress that the data does not indicate that global warming reversed or even halted during that time, as has been suggested by the so-called hiatus theory. "Fyfe said that he and his fellow authors believe that the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) was to blame for the slowdown since 2000. The PDO goes through positive, neutral, and negative cycles. When the PDO is negative, the Earth cools down, slowing global warming. The PDO was negative in the early 2000s. "Fyfe points out that the models are not perfect. The PDO may not be the best explanation for the slowdown they have identified. But, he says, after record warming years in 2014 and 2015, the slowdown is definitely over. "After climate change skeptics attempted to use the last round of “hiatus” evidence to claim that global warming had stopped, there may be fears that the new study will be seized upon by the same people. The climate change hiatus theory was the subject of congressional hearings led by Rep. Lamar Smith (R) of Texas last year. On Friday, NOAA reported receiving new requests from Representative Smith for all documents referring to "climate" and "temperature." "Penn State University climatologist and study co-author Michael Mann said that such concerns should not deter scientists from pursuing the truth. '“As scientists, we must go where the evidence takes us,” said Mann, “we can’t allow our worries about climate contrarians and how they might seek to misrepresent our work to dictate what we do and do not publish.” http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0226/Did-global-warming-pause-Depends-how-you-define-pause
I am unpleasant.... to idiot conservatives like you that say stupid shit like........ NASA? Please. Their primary mission is "muslim outreach" NASA is doing Muslim outreach? Holy shit you are one deluded ignorant conservative troll. So like I thought, you can't read about science. What about NOAA? Are they also doing Muslim outreach? You must be just trolling. No one is this fucking dumb.
He's that dumb. But possibly good at math. Still, dumb enough to try leveraging that skill into politics and religion, lol.
I really wonder if he is doing satire. I have a feeling that we have seen this bonehead before, under a different name.
It's sad and funny that he's beginning to condemn the "liberal arts", on a board (politics and religion!) where the best posters, including the opposition, rely on those disciplines, like history, to support their arguments.
Yeah, that NOAA and NASA............they're all liberal artists. And something about "MUSLIMS!!!!" aaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! MUSLIMS!!!! That may be the first time I have heard Muslims brought up in a debate about AGW. That's some prime red herring there.
Well evidently Ricter is already drunk today and, of course, futurecurrents is permanently stupid but here is the administrator of NASA declaring that the primary mission of his agency is "muslim outreach": The GWS unwinds a little everyday. Nobody cares with deluded warmists say. That isn't to say you can't yammer about it its just that nobody is listening at this point. lol