And by the way, that's exactly what Syrians require from most host countries to gain permanent residency - government id proving theyre syrian.
This modern day Nazi threatens to use force against European countries that oppose the quota of immigrants that the EU enforces upon them. They're really dropping their masks now and showing their true faces. Until now anybody who was opposing the mass-immigration was accused of extreme right sympathies and being a racist and could kiss his career goodbye if he made his opinion heard in public, but now we're crossing the point where you will risk imprisonment. http://www.thecommentator.com/article/5544/eu_considering_a_ban_on_islamophobia_after_paris_attacks In Sweden there's already a law against islamophobia in effect. Welcome to the Third Reich!
Since the days of Mohammed they have been cutting each other's throats and chopping of heads in the ME. The interference of the West hasn't changed anything in this culture and can't serve as a justification for the opening of the EU-borders for millions of Muslims and other backward scum from Africa. 90% of all refugees are male and aged between 20-35. If they really came from war ridden regions they should be the men that are at the front in the battle against their enemies and defending their families and nation. Instead they chose to flee and leave their wives and children behind. Would you do that if your country was struck by war?
During WWII the Germans wanted to show the world their moral superiority by exterminating other races, now they chose to do the same thing by embracing inferior, barbaric cultures. Nazi racial ideology has been replaced by cultural Marxism, but the purpose is the same.
Countries like Poland, which is 97% white and 94% Catholic according to a report I read, will soon have to decide which is more important to them. Remaining part of an increasingly africanized, islamic EU or preserving their national identity. We are facing a similar issue in the US, but only Trump is talking about it.
Godwin's Law in effect I see. Public Islamophobia, I assume... But who's going to the ovens because of limits on hate speech?
Labelling criticism on Islam as hate speech and Islamophia is the issue, but I don't expect you to comprehend that.
I doubt anyone is going to get into trouble there for mere criticism. Someone who is prone to go right to Nazism as part of their argument is likely to go as far as hate speech, though.