ET guys are above average, so lets do a 9/11 poll

Discussion in 'Politics' started by FutTrd, Sep 12, 2006.

ET guys are above average, so lets do a 9/11 poll

  1. 9/11 is inside job, I saw WTC 7 video, I heard explosions

    34 vote(s)
    40.5%
  2. 9/11 is NOT an inside job, any theory otherwise is disgusting.

    42 vote(s)
    50.0%
  3. I just plain don’t know anymore, either way.

    8 vote(s)
    9.5%
  1. volente_00

    volente_00



    I am not an expert but if WTC was plumbed for gas for heating and cooking then it is very possible there were pockets of gas that came from leaks built up inside of kitchens and furnace rooms.
     
    #61     Sep 14, 2006
  2. volente_00

    volente_00




    It was than a few milion. Sure just 5 on the puts, but what about the insurance on TT bought taken out just a few weeks before that had a clause to pay just for terrorism ? What about all of the defense companies that make weapons, tanks etc that just happen to contribute to PACS that support bush and cheney ? I promise you stuff goes down in the CIA that even the president does not knows about.
     
    #62     Sep 14, 2006
  3. Youre not seeing the forrest throught the trees. Look at the big picture. If the govt wanted to go into Iraq, there are a lot easier ways to sway the public than to get 1000's involved with a conspiracy.

    Besides, something I just dont get, if this was done by the gov't needed for provocation to invade Iraq, WHY WERENT THE HIJACKERS IRAQI? You think they were like" well we couldnt get any Iraqis, but we have some Saudis, maybe nobody will notice?"
     
    #63     Sep 14, 2006
  4. volente_00

    volente_00



    If it was normal trading, then why were the profits unclaimed ?
    You mean to tell me you would just let 5 mill set there for years for no reason at all ? The fact that over 4000 puts were bought so far out of the money so close to expiration. It was only only about 3k that turned into 5 million. Just pure luck ?
     
    #64     Sep 14, 2006

  5. Youre not seeing the forrest throught the trees. Look at the big picture. If the govt wanted to go into Iraq, there are a lot easier ways to sway the public than to get 1000's involved with a conspiracy.

    Besides, something I just dont get, if this was done by the gov't needed for provocation to invade Iraq, WHY WERENT THE HIJACKERS IRAQI? You think they were like" well we couldnt get any Iraqis, but we have some Saudis, maybe nobody will notice?"
     
    #65     Sep 14, 2006
  6. Besides, something I just dont get, if this was done by the gov't needed for provocation to invade Iraq, WHY WERENT THE HIJACKERS IRAQI?
     
    #66     Sep 14, 2006
  7. volente_00

    volente_00



    Watch the video. They had fake id's fake passports, etc. 9 of the people named are still alive in the middle east. One guy's passport was stolen from a pickpocket before the attack. You saw pictures of the hijackers but i doubt we really know their true identities or places or origin.
     
    #67     Sep 14, 2006
  8. Okay, then why would the govt have the public think theyre saudis? Surely it would make more sense to havethe public know theyre Iraqis
     
    #68     Sep 14, 2006
  9. volente_00

    volente_00



    according to your assumption then we should have attacked saudi arabia in order to get who is responsible for the attacks. This is about war on the middle east, iraq, afghanistan, iran ?. The attackers were not all saudis so the war can be directed towards multiple areas.
     
    #69     Sep 14, 2006

  10. What?????????????????????????????????????????????????

    The conspiracy is "the US govt staged the WTC attacks so the US would have provocation to invade Iraq" so my question is, why didnt they make the hijackers Iraqi?
     
    #70     Sep 14, 2006