ES Journal Archive (2009 - 2010)

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Jahajee, Jan 1, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. volente_00

    volente_00


    Dec was 1113 when posted



    Now trading 1117



    Notice the buyers who ate the bids up at 1113


    17.75 high tick



    Must be DEMTDAYBOYZ still buying


    :)
     
    #41011     Sep 14, 2010
  2. volente_00

    volente_00





    Really depends on the close as we could fall down but if it reverses intraday then the chart stays intact.


    ~ below 1083 close would be trouble for IHS
     
    #41012     Sep 14, 2010
  3. volente_00

    volente_00

    Hey pekelo or nexxen



    Can you tell me what


    1121.75 - 10 = ?







    And what was the afterhours low ?




    :confused:
     
    #41013     Sep 14, 2010
  4. ammo

    ammo

    reduce 16.25
     
    #41014     Sep 14, 2010
  5. ammo

    ammo

    flat 17.25
     
    #41015     Sep 15, 2010
  6. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

  7. Interesting. I had a band at 1075. Curious to see another view, thanks.
     
    #41018     Sep 15, 2010

  8. Do you then consider 1118 as the AH reaction high? Does that remain valid for RTH at 1108?
     
    #41019     Sep 15, 2010
  9. Pekelo

    Pekelo

    Vol dear, let's keep things in order. First you guys have to prove the T-day upward mobility with profitable trades posted in real time, then we can move on to the 10 pts strategy.

    But don't you worry, there will be 10 Pts Strategy Challenge too! :)

    If you did post a Tidiot trade yesterday, can someone quote it for me??? And as a sidenote, read again what I said about those. I actually said they both had validity, but I don't like the:

    1. Incredibly mindless and childish cheering for them.
    2. Nobody ever post a trade based on them.
    3. The after the fact posts.

    So less cheering, more trading and we will be just fine....Hey, we might even reach TRANQUILITY.

    P.S.: Good Morning, Traders!
     
    #41020     Sep 15, 2010
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.