ES Journal Archive (2006 - 2008)

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Buy1Sell2, Mar 2, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. upper level

    recycling a few trillion back into the market.. is scaring some shorties..
     
    #45761     Oct 12, 2008
  2. Pekelo

    Pekelo

    That chart is provided for free on a website, you just have to know where to look! :)

    I think it is updated nightly...

    Those 3 red arrows in June-July REALLY said sell oil!:

    http://metastocktools.com/MACDH/Oil.png

    Oil promptly dropped 60 bucks before any blue arrow showed up... :)
     
    #45762     Oct 12, 2008
  3. i'm surprised that ES is holding up as well... lets see what it does in European trading.
     
    #45763     Oct 12, 2008
  4. I'm sensing a move back to 1070 over the next week or two. A massive short squeeze to go along with one of the most massive drops in history. It could go higher, but this is the first area I'll be looking to get short for the next move down. Its important to remember that S/R levels work better for catching retraces than calling the end of a strongly impulsing trend.

    IMO a long-term bottom is a long ways away for the US indices... but that's not to say there won't be plenty of playable bounces.
     
    #45764     Oct 12, 2008
  5. ammo

    ammo

    spy puts, oct 107/97 put sprd closed near$8.50,if your right that goes to zero,for a $1.50 risk
     
    #45765     Oct 12, 2008
  6. Specterx

    Specterx

    I agree, consolidation and upwards drift over the next few weeks. But at some point there will be another big leg down. I'm guessing terrible holiday sales, along with a high-profile BK or two, could be the catalyst.
     
    #45766     Oct 12, 2008
  7. ammo

    ammo

    7/15 and 9/18 lows.tl,we broke 5 days ago,comes in around 1100
     
    #45767     Oct 12, 2008
  8. Ronin08

    Ronin08 Guest

    This week witnessed the continuation of the great decline of 2008, what many have
    called the end of free market capitalism as we know it.
    Historic Volatility characterized this week’s Market Behavior.
    Five years ago, Warren Buffett commented that derivatives were 'financial weapons of
    mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are potentially lethal. The
    impact of the endless array of exotic derivatives has now created a freeze on global
    credit.
    One prominent financial figure, however, has long thought otherwise. And his views
    held the greatest sway in debates about the regulation and use of derivatives - exotic
    contracts that promised to protect investors from losses, thereby stimulating riskier
    practices that led to the financial crisis.
    For more than a decade, the former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan played
    the role of the leading proponent for Wall Street derivatives, fiercely arguing before
    Senate Banking Committee in 2003 whenever Congress questioned the nature and
    regulation of derivatives.
    Greenspan testimony:
    1.) What we have found over the years in the marketplace is that derivatives have
    been an extraordinarily useful vehicle to transfer risk from those who shouldn't
    be taking it to those who are willing to and are capable of doing so.
    2.) We [the Federal Reverse] think it would be a mistake' to more deeply regulate
    the contracts, he added.
    Theoretically intended to limit risk and ward off financial problems, the contracts
    instead have stoked uncertainty and actually spread risk amid doubts about how
    companies value them. Many economists have stated that had Greenspan acted
    differently during his tenure as Federal Reserve chairman from 1987 to 2006, the
    current crisis might have been averted.

    The current financial crisis occurred because the financial wizards of Wall Street believe
    the most implausible idea. In what they thought was a moment of sheer genus, the
    Wall Street wizards conceived that the financial sector could get rich by lending money
    to people who couldn't pay it back and selling those loans to unsuspecting investors
    around the world. In order to sweeten up the deal, they paid huge fee to the credit
    rating agency to disguise their sub-prime loans as AAA rated paper and invented bogus
    insurance policies, called credit default swaps to conceive institutional clients that if the
    loans went bad they would get back their principle.
    With the scheme worked out, they set about to market it, by luring the all to gullible
    American consumer into to believing they could go on forever spending money they did
    have on things they didn’t need. Why they ever got the President to tell the nation
    consumerisms was downright patriotic.
    And there you have it; simple stated the greatest Ponzi scheme ever portrayed on the
    world stage. We the American people must take credit for this Ponzi scheme that our
    financial system created and perpetrated. Denial of the facts will not serve our national
    interest. Acceptance of the facts will make it possible for us to put an end to it.
    The choice is ours. We either get our heads around what’s going on in our world and
    figure out how we, its citizens can shape it for the better or Ogilvy’s view of our world
    will prove right.
    Ogilvy said power is in advertizing. Ogilvy worked with the Intelligence Service at the
    British Embassy in Washington. He analyzed and made recommendations on matters of
    diplomacy and security. Ogilvy extrapolated his knowledge of human behavior from
    intelligence to nationalism to consumerism. Ogilvy research was picked up on by the
    Eisenhower Psychological Warfare Board who used his techniques of field secret
    successfully in Europe during the last year of the war.
    In his book, Confessions of an Advertising Man, Ogilvy state the function of advertising
    is to sell, and that successful advertising for any product is based on information about
    its consumer. The principle is simple, figure out what the person wants to believe and
    exploit it. Manipulate the person’s ego.
    We American’s want to believe they can have it all. We’ve been programmed to believe
    that all our lives. We are programmed to want instant gratification. We are programmed
    to constantly desire more and more; to consumer; to shop till we drop. We’re been
    exposed to more commercial advertizing than any other human beings in history. Our
    life style, the fact that most of us spend hours watching TV then we do talking to the
    members of our family’s, has shaped our minds into to a race non-critical thinkers; a
    nation who have forgotten how to think beyond the sound bite.
     
    #45768     Oct 13, 2008
  9. Ronin08

    Ronin08 Guest

    All this has made us gullible; gullible enough to believe that we could give up our
    manufacturing jobs and still live the good life. And now here we are; the baby boom
    generation and we have let ourselves get skewed. This week the nation sat by and
    watched as billions of dollars in equity disappeared before our eyes. The Blue Chip Dow
    30, the NASDAQ Composite and the Broad Benchmark S&P 500 all sold off back to their
    bear market lows.
    The hallucinations of the Wall Street wizards turned into a bad acid trip. The immense
    worldwide credit bubble they created has burst. Now a huge anti-bubble is forming – in
    a Newtonian sense, it is likely to create an equal and opposite reaction. Those to whom
    we owe money, and god knows we are the greatest debtor’s nation on earth, are not
    likely to invest in our next sub-prime Ponzi scheme. I fear that we sown the seeds of
    our own demise. If and when the economies of the world can figure out how to get
    along without us, they will.
    Ten years ago, the giant Cayman Island hedge fund, called Long Term Capital
    Management hired a group of math wizards including several former university
    professors, including two Nobel Prize-winning economists, who dreamt up an all
    encompassing algorithm, a so-called the model of everything.
    Long-Term Capital Management commanded more than $100 billion in assets. Between
    1994 and 1998 the fund showed a return on investment of more than 40% per annum.
    However, its enormously leveraged gamble with various forms of arbitrage involving
    more than $1 trillion dollars went bad, and in one month, LTCM lost $1.9 billion. The
    collapse of the Hedge Fund was American financial disaster, with significant
    international monetary implications, that put the entire financial system jeopardy.
    Prompted by deep concerns about LTCM's thousands of derivative contracts, in order to
    avoid a panic by banks and investors worldwide, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
    stepped in to organize a bailout with the various major banks at risk. Wall Street feared
    that its unraveling could set off a systemic meltdown.
    So, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York called in the big financial houses to help with
    the rescue. It worked. The crisis was averted. LTCM's positions were liquidated in an
    orderly fashion.
    No firm had a closer view of Long-Term Capital than Bear Stearns, the broker that
    cleared its trades. And it was Bear that sounded the first shot in the current mortgage
    crisis. In summer 2007, amid a sharp rise in delinquencies on subprime mortgages, two
    hedge funds sponsored by Bear that invested in high-rated mortgage securities
    imploded. As foreclosures kept rising, other institutions suffered losses and the crisis
    spread. The leveraged exposure eventually took down Bear Stearns.

    However, the problem was much bigger than anyone expected or was willing to admit.
    The problem wasn’t with one or two hedge funds. The whole financial system was
    involved. Trillions of dollars of new cash and credit are being pumped in the system.
    The result was that real estate prices were inflated to the point where genuine buyers,
    hard working people able to save a down payment couldn’t afford to buy a home. All
    the while, good loans were being mixed with bad loans and were sold as AAA grade
    investment vehicles, backed by bogus overleveraged unregulated insurance policies, the
    so-called credit swaps.
    But this time, the fix doesn't seem to stay fixed. Bad positions can't be unwound in an
    orderly manner; there are too many of them. And it's not just a handful of speculators
    who are getting whacked: it's effecting the entire population of the United States of
    America, Great Britain and Europe.
    The Fed is buying assets that no one in their right mind would touch. Her majesty's
    government is now proprietor of 50 billion pounds worth of banking shares; the Bush
    administration, under the guidance of Treasury Sectary Paulson is preparing to enter
    the banking business too. But as trillions go in, trillions more leak out. So far this year,
    world equity markets have lost $20 trillion. U.S. property markets alone have lost $6
    trillion over the last two years. It is not just a few investment decisions that are being
    corrected, in other words, it's the delusions of an entire generation. And why? Because
    after overleveraged liquidity comes the liquidation. After the outsized recklessness
    comes the appropriate regret.
    We have all lived through recessions (1973-74 and 1980-82). Recessions are simply
    part of the business cycle and government cannot repeal the business cycle. At some
    point the economic cycle will find a way to eventually get back to solid growth. This will
    not be the last recession.
    However, depressions are caused by governments. Depressions are the result major
    policy mistakes. Our government, not republicans, not democrats, the government
    made major policy mistakes some by deregulating mortgage lending. The government
    made major policy mistakes by allowing the five large investment banks to increase
    their leverage to 30 or 40 to one. The government made major policy mistakes by
    failing to oversee the rating agencies.
    Coming to terms with the cost of our mistakes is what we have to take away from the
    financial crisis of 2008.
    An immediate comprehensive plan is called for. Not to come up with a real solutions
    risks a much greater problem. To not take actions to stem the credit crisis would be
    that major policy mistake which would compound all the other mistakes.
     
    #45769     Oct 13, 2008
  10. Ronin08

    Ronin08 Guest

    Letting Lehman go under has brought to light just how pervasive the problem is. The
    consequences of allowing Lehman fail demonstrated the severity of the credit crisis.
    Based on the results of Friday’s credit auction it is estimated that current exposure to
    risk will prove very costly. Many funds will be forced to dump assets to meet the
    payment demands if they haven't hedged.
    It may be too early to predict how much of that debt will eventually have to be
    absorbed by various government programs and capital infusions. But you can bet it will
    be a lot.
    Many firms have already write-downs their losses. According to the International Swaps
    and Derivatives Association Lehman’s CDS holdings are likely to be sorted out with no
    failures. If that proven to be true then what the global financial markets went through
    this week was just a near death experience.
    Regardless, the CDS markets MUST be regulated. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange
    would be a good place for the CDS market to publicly trade. While there are always
    serious risk of loss in any exchange-traded market, there was no systemic risk. When
    publicly traded the value of their various securities are known to everyone. The market
    participants are assured by the exchange they will receive full value positions are
    redeemed.
    It was foolish to allow a market the size of CDS market go unregulated. Those who
    were lured to play that game got what they deserved. John Mauldin suggests that in
    the future the various main actors will look back at the failure of Lehman as the
    proverbial "last straw" for the unregulated CDS markets.
    The unregulated shadow CDS market has resulted in a credit freeze. The LIBOR index
    has historical traded in lock-step move with the Fed funds rate. The recent spike in the
    LIBOR rate has not responded to this week's Fed funds cut. The spreads are wider than
    ever. As Mauldin’s notes, the problem is not just the price of LIBOR. There is no trading
    at any price. The LIBOR market is a fiction today. And left unchecked, this lack of
    dealing with other banks will spread to letters of credit and the international trade
    markets.
    The G-7 group of nations is holding emergency meetings this weekend and reports are
    serious disagreements exist as to what to do. They cannot even agree on a press
    release.
    In an interview on PBS Television's Charlie Rose, Former Federal Reserve Chairman
    Paul Volcker urged all the G-7 nations to admit to the fact their own banks are going to
    need support.

    It is absolutely essential that the world's largest economies act together, and act
    together, says UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling. Governments must
    guarantee lending between banks; either by turning central banks into clearing houses
    for the loans or have governments take them over.
    The idea of governments taking over the Central Banking System is a change of
    dramatic portions. The suggestion indicates World Leaders acknowledge the system is
    at the point of no return. It’s no longer about bailing out financial institutions.
    Governments are literally talking about taking over the Central Banking System to save
    the world economy.
    The fact is continued bank failures would guarantee a worldwide recession. The
    markets are not working. There are no signs that the markets will work. If this course
    continues history is likely to repeat itself. The last depression produced severe political
    backlash and a world war.
    We are living in extraordinary times. We are witnessing the collapse of free markets.
    Basically, the U.S. has had 30 years of Regan Style Milton Freeman laissez-faire
    capitalism where the preemies had been, government is the problem, do away with
    government regulation, stay aside and let the free market works. This week, what the
    Senior Bush called voodoo economic came back to haunt the nation. The extreme
    promise of supply-side economics has not materialized.
    In his 1962 book Capitalism and Freedom, Friedman advocated minimizing the role of
    government in a free market as a means of creating political and social freedom. This
    week’s historical decline in the DOW proved that free market capitalism isn’t working.
    Why has Free Market Capitalism failed? The simple honest answer is that those in
    positions of authority, government and corporate leaders, have exploited the laissezfaire
    capitalism, which have been implemented in monetary policy, taxation,
    privatization and deregulation around the globe, especially the administrations of
    Ronald Reagan in the U.S., Brian Mulroney in Canada, Margaret Thatcher in Britain, and
    Augusto Pinochet in Chile, and recently in Eastern Europe, for personal gain.
    Everything the neo-conservative Regan Style Milton Freeman free market capitalists
    believed has failed. Those in positions to exploit the public trust have wiped out the
    shareholders of America greatest companies, have taken huge sums of money and
    bailed out with their golden parachutes.
    While a few have becomes fabulously rich, the Milton Freeman Free Market Capitalist’s
    have now turned to government to bail them out. After hearing for years that
    government is the problem, that social programs don’t work, these neo-conservative
    free market capitalist’s now tell us the only thing that can save the global economy is
    economic socialism with them as its primary recipient.
    You and I and our children and our children’s children will be paying for the cost of
    cleaning up the mess.
    This could not happen at a more inopportune time. At this time theirs is lack of
    leadership. It is difficult for people to know who to have faith in. Government’s efforts
    so far have had no effect. The FED’s policies have done nothing to correct the situation.
    Most of us are inclined to think the markets should be allowed to work or simply want
    those who created the crisis to pay. Those of us who saw this crisis coming are
    frustrated that no one bothered to pay attention. There’s a lot of anger out there.
     
    #45770     Oct 13, 2008
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.