ES Journal Archive (2006 - 2008)

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Buy1Sell2, Mar 2, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ....it seems like almost everyone on here was biased to the short side..... and we have only gone up....
    and still it seems most posters are biased to the short side......interesting....
    ....great call islands111 .....

     
    #17681     Aug 22, 2007
  2. new triangle setup..... already popped by now
     
    #17682     Aug 22, 2007
  3. WALL STREET CITY
    WallStreetCity.com

    Inside Wall Street Oct 22 1998 3:33PM CST

    The Real Story Behind the Fed Ease

    By Paul Lam
    Senior Markets Writer

    Contrary to what most would like to believe, the Federal Reserves
    abrupt decision to cut interest rates on Oct.15 was not so much due to
    concerns over a slowing economy or credit crunch. The action, which came
    16 days after the first 0.25% rate cut, was outside the normal context
    of a Federal Open Market Committee meeting, which does not convene again
    until Nov. 17. It was a response to an immediate meltdown threat of the
    banking system.

    According to informed sources, the Fed had been injecting liquidity into
    major banks even before the Oct. 15 ease. Federal Reserve repo tenders,
    which are repurchases of Treasury securities held by banks in return for
    short-term cash, a common way to add liquidity to the banking system,
    rose by 35% during the two weeks prior to the surprise rate-cut.

    The Oct. 15 ease, on top of the recent surge in liquidity available to
    banks, reportedly came after urgent requests from the resident of the
    Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, who told Federal Reserve chairman
    Alan Greenspan of extraordinary demands by one member bank in its
    region.

    Reliable sources indicate that this demand for repo funds had been
    provoked by a credit squeeze in the interbank market against Bank of
    America (BAC:NYSE). Bankers believe that the bank's troubles are far
    more serious than what is being
    told to the public. Bank of America made a $357 million loss write-off
    due to its participation in the troubled hedge fund D.E. Shaw, and
    bought $20 billion in outstanding securities and derivatives contracts
    from that hedge fund in order to
    prevent its demise. The grave danger on Oct. 15 was of a breakdown in
    the interbank payments system, which could have easily led to a global
    systemic collapse.

    While investors around the world rejoice the Feds action by
    outrageously bidding up stock prices, the more alarming message is that
    the emerging markets crisis has now fully reached the G7 financial
    systems.


    <old story but very similar in dynamics>
     
    #17683     Aug 22, 2007
  4. thanks for the article spectre.
    it's eerie how history repeats itself.
    i haven't been trading a lot myself this week.
    working on my method, because i realized that my last one was critically flawed.
    good trading to all!
     
    #17684     Aug 23, 2007
  5. 1482 retest.
     
    #17685     Aug 23, 2007
  6. Nice movement on ES after hours. Maybe I should start trading in the evening??? :confused: :confused: When I left yesterday it was around 1460 and it went to over 1482. Nice ride ...it would have been. :D :D
     
    #17686     Aug 23, 2007
  7. my sells that were moved up to the 80 zone for the gap, were covered here @ 75.25.....on the 5`s....looking for a retest of 83/85.
     
    #17687     Aug 23, 2007
  8. Do you really think we gonna print in 83-85 zone?
     
    #17688     Aug 23, 2007
  9. 1478 is equilibrium.
     
    #17689     Aug 23, 2007
  10. with the ponzi scheme in full gear...the fed pumpin presidents,the bulls have commenced their bloated pig dance thanks to the "anticipation" of a big juicy cut.they could take it to 1500/1508 as long as the printing/pumping continues.

    the overnight hi is 83.75....so why not?....if they fall short,i`ll still be in that zone ....80/85... as a seller,with more to sell above but conservative.
     
    #17690     Aug 23, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.