ES Journal - 2014

Discussion in 'Journals' started by murica, Jan 1, 2014.

  1. It's about probabilities and likelihood of events in my opinion (as opposed to r:r ratios)
    Anyone can go through all of my calls and see what percentage that 63 points was of the amount that i've made in my posts. It was never a huge deal (dispite the amusing posts from others :))
    I would have begun to change my mind when my fundamental bias and understanding of the way the markets are manipulated and their dynamics changed.
    I would need to see certain evidence for that. Doubt it'll happen in my lifetime.
    We go up over time. We Have too.
    cheers
     
    #6141     Aug 18, 2014
  2. What pinkman may not realize is that he's better off buying and holding for years. Which is obviously a great strategy when the market is continually making new highs. He's not a trader, which is perfectly fine - he doesn't get stopped out and buy back in when the market hits a local minimum. It's a very unsophisticated way to generate return, but it works in this market. Nothing wrong with that at all.
     
    #6142     Aug 18, 2014
  3. -4 ticks.
     
    #6143     Aug 18, 2014
  4. Right, I understand all that. However, the market doesn't have to wait for major fundamental changes before it in itself changes. And the changes can happen quite abruptly, no? Case in point, what just happened with your last trade. I mean let's be honest, you were not expecting a 63 point move against your long, otherwise, you wouldn't have taken it, right? And the next abrupt move against your position could go for 100-150 points, which is less than 10 percent off the highs, which would also keep the market in an uptrend, right? So to rephrase the question I asked previously, how far will you let a wrong move go against you without any fundamental changes to the market?? Please be frank. Thanks.
     
    #6144     Aug 18, 2014
  5. Right, but If it wasn't for the numerous trades he's posting on a weekly and monthly basis, then the investor classification would be true. He's quiet in severe pullback though. So I'm not sure we can safely say that he's an investor, although his buy and hold (during big pullbacks) does in fact indicate that.
     
    #6145     Aug 18, 2014
  6. Mo06

    Mo06

    Not if he is consistently beating the index in his trading.


     
    #6146     Aug 18, 2014
  7. Perhaps depends on your definition of investor. I think he comes close. He is only long, doesn't use stops, gets very quiet during a pullback (nervous?).

    As to if he's consistently beating ES/SPY on an annual basis, let's ask him... I'd much rather trade a few times as he does and beat the market than trade 10-40 times a week and beat the market.
     
    #6147     Aug 18, 2014
  8. burn8

    burn8

    This sort of trading in something like the ES will make you broke in the long-run.

    -burn8
     
    #6148     Aug 18, 2014
  9. Scaleout.Scalper

    Scaleout.Scalper Guest

    Absolutely, looks great in a bull or doji year, comes a bear year and it either wipes you out, or you don't perform due to using under-leverage.

    For that, might as well, dump things in a 401k and get better tax benefits.
     
    #6149     Aug 18, 2014
  10. Wowza. Up and up and up. It's as if that drop never happened. Kudos, Mr. Pinkman
     
    #6150     Aug 19, 2014