The mainTrader ( PAYMAN ) has kicked him outof the room and now he claims he has never been part of the room ,, one day in the room the target was not met and the trade went against him by 10 points ,, what did market Deception do ? he said guys I got filled so I think we can class this as a FILLED and instead of considering it as LOSS he gave his EX_ partner 10 points WIN for the trade .. if he has slightest integrity he would confirm what I just wrote? he either would say I am lying or confirming it ,, Another trick that I noticed The main Trader uses is , when he panics and decides he is on the wrong side of the market he panics and says Close the trade at break even and he magically types ZERO for profit and loss even though the trade is still few ticks in loss.. LOL ... I told him that in a private message and he ignored me Both AL MOHSENI ( AKA MARKET DECEPTION ) and PAYMAN ( WINBORN ) are fools who are perhaps not aware of it ,,
You are great whohoooo what a MATHEMATICIAN YOU ARE,,, You obviusly donot understand stat or math and have taken what I wrote out of context to defend your self Look at the following examples and learn ,, Example .. you cannot have sex with your mum ,, this does not mean having sex is wrong ,,, ( only wrong if the other party is your mum or sister ) This is called outof context quotation and this is what you have done, I said you cannot apply MONTA CARLO to time series to justify enteries as Financial time series carry INFORMATION ( example AAPL would not trend down all day if it was not because of STEVE JOBS HEALTH PROBLEM HITTING THE MARKET) If you donot understand this basic example I am sure the rest of the people on board can understand what I am trying to say . If I was you I would change my nick name to Market confusion than exception ,, what is fair is fair ,,,
Trades For Tuesday: This signal can be interpreted as follows: If the market opens above 1331.25 and it moves down to 1327.25 then there is a high probability that it bounces back up and not go down immediately.
Profitl level according to above = 3.25 Loss level = 5 points Now this is where the problem lies a) Reward / Risk < 1 instead of being > 1 2) there is no statistical reason to justify that this is a HIGH PROBABILITY trade .. Only it is high probability because he says so ,,, It is fine ( but not a great idea ) to have lower target than stop PROVIDED THE HIGH PROBABILY IS DOCUMENTED and not because I SAY SO ,, Those who donot understand expectancy often argue 1) I have back tested data over 100 years lol and come to the conclusion that it is a high probability trade , Ask them how you back tested and what parameters were optimised during the process then they put you on their IGNORE LIST 2) I have been doing this for last past 10 years and it has wokred for me To have a much wider stop than target means i donot know if my entry is of any good and reliable so lets HOPE the stop does not take me out first ,, Was not you the guy who was defending WINBORN for his entry ? so how come you have such a large stop and smaller target,,, Infant analysis of the futures market
I love how it's switched from a signal to, this can be interpreted as follows. If we open here we might bounce before crashing. Awesome. With those guidelines, we can all look like super stars.