ROFLMAO You really think that "large players" browse the internet for signal posting scumbags like you and take their signal right away - and with size!? LOL The year is still young, but this post right here has my vote for the most ridiculous post of the year.
You've embarassed yourself quite a few times last year on this board. Your "82%, 3.3 profit factor, 13yrs of data based engine system" has been trending downwards for months is now stopped at a 20 ES pts Loss. Maybe your next step is to build a system that breaks even after comission and slippage. One thing is for sure though... your cocky, fraudster ass will be humbled again by the market.
This just gets better and better. I guess Goldman Sachs was cruising around when they found this man out of no where who claimed to have a good system. They jumped all over it and ruined it. The failure had nothing to do with routinely risking 5 points to earn 1 point. That couldn't have been it.
This is a known fact that there are people who just look for published signals that have at least 5-6 wins in a row. Then they jump in and trade with large contracts and move to next. It is not a bad strategy and I think the odds is in their favor without much effort. I would not be surprised if Goldman Sacks or any other giant financial institution may implement such a strategy alongside their other strategies. I am still looking for a solution.
Man, you are golden. Yeah, Goldman shits themselves every time they hear some one was able to get six wins in a row. Especially win they risk 500% more than they stand to make. Fuck it.
This is the most stupid comments I have ever seen,, 5 ,6 wins in a row? lol ,,, the best systems have large number of losers but with positive expectancy,,( All trend following unlike oscillatory codes have low hit rate but the profit ones are run to max) ,, After reading your posts I am afraid to say you have zero understanding of the market and the mathematical modelling of time series Just one word of advise,,,,, Donot get people to follow you and lose their capital ,,, what goes round comes round and you will pay back big time for other people's losses...
To me the most stupid posts are the ones that are trying to prove the negate of a possibility with very limited information such as your post. Other possible examples are: 1 - God does not exist 2 - Government is not corrupt. 3 - Is not going to rain tomorrow, etc. For your info, the possibility that I mentioned originated from a professional broker (18 years of experience) who is very familiar with my system. He mentioned to me that he has seen many such cases before. It does not need a genius to figure out that win rate alone does not determine the success of a system. Obviously they do not only look at win rate alone to determine if they want to trade a system. I personally saw this happening several times in WinbornTraders trading room. As soon as he announced his signal, 800 contracts were added to limit and target prices. He canceled a signal and contracts disappeared. Not a prove, just a possibility. Also for your info, my complete system is up over 32% (in real money prototype account based on 1 contracts per $8,000) so far in Jan with about 45 trades.
Buddy, rethoric is not your thing, is it? because it is obvious to everyone that you're the one in that case who comes with extremely limited information with that fantasy broker story who obviously doesn't know shit about trading or wait a second.... would you be lying again to save face? On the other hand, we know the facts and we use common sense - can you see the difference? Let me spell it out one more time for you: no professional or big house such as GS will put any money on a noob's signal found on a message board, even if the said noob starts with 5 wins in a row.
Who cares about your fantasy trading. You had 3 months to show a profit and you end up down 20ES points. End of story, stop lying.