Review of Thursday: We had two trades. Signal # 1 triggered and ended up with 5 points of loss. Signal # 3 triggered at 11:00 AM to go long and made a 4 points profit. So we had a net loss of 1 point. Total # of trades = 13 # of wins = 7 Total profit = 14.5 + 4 - 0.25 = 18.25 (deduct 1 tick to compensate for any future questionable fills) Total Loss = 25.5 + 5 = 30.5 Win rate = 54% PF = 0.6 Trades for Friday 11/5/2010:
I don't think anyone needs to bark here. I take it back. You're a great trader and your system is awesome. This is amazing. How in the world did you ever come up with these high probability trades? I want to join! Sign me up.
well no barking this time? how come? I had never seen a sarcastic dog before. You can not determine the outcome of a system by 13 trades. Any judgment based on 13 trades is pure stupidity. You and your other gang member better shut up for a while and watch a longer time outcome otherwise you are proving your stupidity over and over and over. Now you can bark.
Review of Friday: We had no trades on. Total # of trades = 13 # of wins = 7 Total profit = 14.5 + 4 - 0.25 = 18.25 (deduct 1 tick to compensate for any future questionable fills) Total Loss = 25.5 + 5 = 30.5 Win rate = 54% PF = 0.6
Review of Monday: Our trade #3 triggered and lost 5.25 points. Total # of trades = 14 # of wins = 7 Total profit = 18.25 Total Loss = 30.5 + 5.25 = 35.75 Win rate = 50% PF = 0.51 Trades for Tuesday:
Roughly a month of trading since the scammer started posting signals and the system keeps losing money with total losses twice as big as total wins! for those who didn't catch yet MarketDeception is a fraud, here is how our scammer was "marketing" his system: As he's been told before, anyone can get great results in backtest. But it takes a strong edge to keep the numbers up in forward testing and then in real trading. Obviously this system has no edge at all and was curve/over fitted.
I am not a scammer and this system does have a strong edge. The win rate and PF I reported before are not back testing results. It only has one variable related to amount of stop that is optimized. However, the optimization is on a flat surface. If the variable changes, the result does not change by much. It does not have any filter either to suggest curve fitting. Anyway, by only 13 trades, you can not possibly come up with the above conclusions. In the last few trades, this system has lost but I am certain in long run it will catch up to its historical performance.