Entire ME imploding

In other words, you knew jack shit about the actual law, but your position was based on speculation/partisanship.

Good to know!

 

He thinks he has "skill".

 

I don't think they upheld it because of the reason given nor did I predict what the reason given would be.There were numerous reasons they could have upheld it or struck it down so that was never an issue with me .They also didnt need to mention "consequences" in their decision but you can bet your ass that that was part of the closed door discussions and part of the decision

The difference between me and you is you thought they would make the judgement purely on constitutional grounds,I knew they weren't

 

I do,thats why I was here posting and you were away from ET doing whatever it is you do when not at ET

 

So, are you proud of the fact that they are dismissing the constitutiion?

 

Oh..so the SCOTUS just made up that part about it being a tax? Really?

My whole point actually, had you really KNOWN in the absolute sense of the word. You would have also KNOWN why.

You mean you GUESSED they wouldn't. Anyway, they were supposed to make a judgement purely on constitutional grounds. It's their fucking job.

 

No,but I accept reality

 

Again, lucky not skillful. The result is the same.

 

Geez. It's obvious why IQ doesn't trade. You can't live in a fantasy world and be a successful trader.

 

1.They didn't make up the part about being a tax,but they could have used other reasons to uphold it or strike it down

2.I did know why.The reason given why it was upheld is not the real reason it was upheld

3.No ,it wasn't a guess.The SC has been making decisions that are not based on the constitution for a long time