Ensign vs. Amibroker

Discussion in 'Trading Software' started by TheOne, Jan 24, 2003.

  1. I think that getting the real-time data through QT is a bit of a headache, you have to run one more program. I am getting the RT ES data from IB via Sierracharts and that's enough in this respect. What I need is some program for historical testing with continuous intraday data supply. That's why I decided to start using Ensign. I might still take a look at Amibroker, although as far as programming language is concerned I prefer Ensign again because it is based on Pascal that I love. All I really need is some source of intraday ES data that could allow me to get it after the session is over. Ensign allows you to do that, so does myTrack for $55 a month with Sierracharts. Perhaps I will ulimately switch to myTrack to get intraday data that I will be using with Amibroker.

    Does Amibroker support the Sierrachart data format?
     
    #11     Jan 24, 2003
  2. You can, but they are delayed, which is fine with me because I need it for backtesting only. Try the free trial for one week to see that it works.
     
    #12     Jan 24, 2003
  3. ALICE

    ALICE

    I don't what you're talking about with regard to QT. That program is extremely easy to use. You can even run multiple instances of QT without any headaches at all. So I have no idea what you mean by "headache". QT is headache free. And you can feed AB with QT fetching quotes -EQUITIES & FUTURES- in real time from IB. What could be easier and cheaper?
     
    #13     Jan 24, 2003
  4. One

    One

    Alice,

    IB is one of the brokers I use, but I can't rely on their feed for analysis and backtesting, a communication problem would screw everything up in my systems.


    Wally,

    How much of a delay is there with sierra and mytrack with intra day data?
     
    #14     Jan 24, 2003
  5. dis

    dis

    Few things are more expensive in this business than cheap backtesting software. Stay away from Amibroker.
     
    #15     Jan 24, 2003
  6. ALICE

    ALICE

    Are you sure IB's data is bad? That might have been true in the past but now I think it is quite good, or at least good enough. When I compared IB's quotes with another quote source that claims tickXtick data, IB was noticeably faster by a fraction of a second.

    What kind of analysis are you doing that is that sensitive to minor discrepancies in data?? (discrepancies that you can never circumvent IMO)
     
    #16     Jan 24, 2003
  7. Good, so use it, who says you should not, but you still cannot get any historical data this way and if IB is down your data is incomplete. That's why I need Ensign or myTrack as the cheapest providers of complete intraday data.

    It is a potential headache for me to have one more program open because that means one more chance to get your system crashed and your computer slowed down. I try to run as few programs as possible when I trade and not as many as can be run even if my system is very well optimized. I already take chances trading, and that's enough for me...

    And I used QT in the past... being happy with that, but right now see no need for it. I definitely do not like to pay much, but some expenses cannot be avoided in any business.
     
    #17     Jan 24, 2003
  8. That's a good question, I would love to know the answer myself. I have yet to use the myTrack data feed, so cannot answer it. Perhaps someone else could.
     
    #18     Jan 24, 2003
  9. One

    One

    Alice,

    IB's feed has been reliable for execution, but if my connection went down I would lose all continuity in the time series for analysis. Unless I am mistaken, I would have no way of retrieving data from sessions where I was not connected, say travelling, as well. Currently using Tradestation but it seems expensive versus other services.
     
    #19     Jan 24, 2003
  10. I think that IB's data is good, what is not good is that sometimes it is not complete when they are down or they have some Globex problems.
     
    #20     Jan 24, 2003