Enhancing Market Efficiency vs Market Manipulation

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by HoundDogOne, Jan 2, 2007.

  1. This is a serious thread and question.

    The only thing that puts stock trading...
    On a higher MORAL PLANE than casino gambling...
    Or playing 3 Card Monte on the street corner...
    And makes it a socially respectable profession...
    Is the fact that your trading activity ** increases the efficiency ** of the capital markets...
    That are the very foundation of America and it's Capitalist System...
    And translates into immense economic and social good.

    So when grandma goes to buy/sell some stock...
    She pays a little less... or gets a little more...
    Because some independent trader has bid more than another trader...
    And enhanced market efficiency.

    Can someone give me a specific example...
    Of a form of ** market manipulation for profit **... that "enhances efficiency".

    Or conversely...
    Can someone give me an example...
    Of a perfectly legal, non-manipulative form of scalping...
    That "decreases efficiency".

    In other words DISPROVE the following where scalping = short term trading:

    All scalping that "decreases market efficiency"...
    Is a form of market manipulation and illegal whether enforced or not...

    And

    All scalping that "enhances market efficieny"...
    Is non-manipulative and legal.
     
  2. If good news comes out on a stock intraday and i immediately buy 1000 shares at market, would i be increasing or decreasing efficiency?
     
  3. Here are my 1st and 2nd laws of market efficiency:

    If your action makes the market less predictable, your are contributing to its efficiency.

    It cost money to make market efficient - the wining traders basically make market efficient at lower-than-average cost.