Here's a actual SL in LVLD where there is zero hidden. Single symbol -> vol adjust at 0 pertaining to the toggled-ticker and ALL positions (toggled). Not some pathetic attempt to beta a hidden index position against TSLA. If you actually knew anything you'd know why TSLA wouldn't have worked over the period in question, even with a vol-shift of more than 600 beeps. The one shown below is conformal and is an arb within -140 beeps lower on D3 vol. It's showing LTD, not expiration. You're out of your depth, but worse you're FOS.
Here. Can't involve a hidden ticker. Single symbol -> 0 volshft. I'm done here as I've proven my case as I had when tweeting about your BS/TSLA beta-stress against a hidden index position.
It's not possible to select "TSLA" because it automatically selects all simuated combos, while I only wanted to show one: As soon as I click "TSLA" then it selects all my combos, which I didn't want to include: That's just how ToS works.
I don't dispute that point. I am stating that your stress showing TSLA is proof of nothing. The position is an index stress beta to TSLA and vol-boosted but unseen. If you had TOGGLED TSLA it would have blown the stress. Here's my terminal stress on the three tenor. No TSLA-beta stress, no vol-shift, no hidden positions. Nothing under the SPX complex, descending. You got caught and no measure of BS here is going to change that. The only purpose of leaving TSLA untoggled was to scam with a hidden index stress as purportedly in TSLA and what's hidden is the iceberg. Dude, this ain't my first rodeo. Edit, I will not respond further to scammers. Send the subpoena.
Before I leave. I don't dispute your net liq bc, well, whatever (act as if) but I would bet that the June jump was a exogenous cash add to the account. "Balance History" is not a return figure.
Obiously there are many possible variants, targetting different strikes and DTEs. Also, even though I know his trade structure, I may trade similar but different trades that he has not found, while they may show great performance in backtests. But here is something similar to his, setup just now:
Scam. A hidden position under what's shown with individual line items that are vol-boosted. Do you see how he's careful to not allow any space under the redacted position? Ofc it's "better" than mine because it's fantasy/fraud.