End of forex brokers CME & Reuters join forces

Discussion in 'Forex Brokers' started by RedDuke, May 4, 2006.

  1. It is all about the size you trade, for example, Aaron wants a minimum size of 500k per trade for a fee of $25 per mio. This is pretty much standard for the industry, CX is CX. And getting it lower than $50 is possible you just have to be able to trade the size and then negotiate. If you are at $25-$30 with no size requirements, that is pretty good.


    The Ever Venomous VIPER
     
    #51     Sep 2, 2006
  2. Anyway, with 500K as min amt required by Currenex brokers, with a charge of $25 per side, this amounts to $50 per round turn per 500K, way cheaper than the reatil brokers for EUR/USD at 3pip spread of 5lotsx3pips x $10=150 per round turn.
    Anyone disagree with me?

    Any complaints with Currenex with ManFinancial USA/SG/CA?
    Best Currenex provider in USA?
     
    #52     Sep 3, 2006
  3. Will this also mean an end to the Currency Futures currently trading on Globex eg EURU6?
     
    #53     Sep 3, 2006
  4. 500K in EUR at IB = 4 contracts = $12 per side. fwiw
     
    #54     Sep 3, 2006
  5. PIPe PIPer and Viper, I agree that $25 per million per side is great, but PFG wanted to charge us $50 per million per side ($100 round trip per million - 1 pip). This makes no sense, so I wonder how they're getting business (unless, of course, the guys that I spoke to were trying to pull a fast one on me).
     
    #55     Sep 3, 2006
  6. Good point.
     
    #56     Sep 3, 2006
  7. Any thoughts on why CME/Reuters time table is so bloody slow? - other than deliberate. Compared to roll out of equity options electronic markets like ISE, this is a joke. Effectively, there only a handful of liquid currency pairs... Equity options, for example, have thousands of securities. more options in Q's than total currency pairs.
     
    #57     Sep 13, 2006
  8. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    What's the rush for them? The big guys can currently trade on inner bank plarform, and small fish like us can wait.
     
    #58     Sep 13, 2006
  9. Yep, deliberate - other than they could sweep and shatter all bucket MMs, period. For that reason alone, you would think they would do it.

    But the concept of a centralized spot currency and spot currency options market is not in the banks interest - which is why it has not happened to date. It would be like having a centralized high yield, distressed, and convertible bond market.
     
    #59     Sep 13, 2006
  10. Miami,

    I read on another board from a former Reuters employee that Reuters is just really slow at rolling anything new out and that when the proposed date was mentioned, as 2006-2007 the opinion was that it would definitely be 2007 at the earliest.

    Depending on how the product is structured, there could still be a niche market for retail bucket shops, but nothing like the "good old days" going on right now.
     
    #60     Sep 13, 2006