I don't believe I've ever posted any intrinsically anti-black rhetoric in chit-chat. If I've pointed out facts, those being that blacks commit an immensely disproportionate share of crimes around the globe then I suppose relativist PC police may find me guilty. However have I ever said that blacks are genetically or intellectually inferior to whites? Have I ever said blacks are pre-disposed to criminal behavior? I think not.
Liberal mind works in miraculous ways. I wonder why would they think that you said something if you did not. May be because that is what Liberals think themselves.
I could go on and on.... Quote from Pabst: White folk who've never lived with blacks are the bleeding hearts. Those of us who've grown up in "changing" neighborhoods can attest that many blacks are vicious, racist garbage. certainly not all. But it's a numbers game. If let's say 15% of all white people are complete pricks I'd say about 40% of blacks fall into that category.
Is that a racist statement? If you say that 40% of the Republicans are neo-con war mongers who prefer tax cuts to socialism is that an anti Republican observation or perhaps a truism that you've discovered and stated? Is starkly delivered criticism prejudicial? If one talks about the military and trade ambitions of China as being a threat to the future of the U.S., is that a tirade against the Chinese as a people? Hardly. One of the reason's blacks have failed to assimilate economically in American society on the same plane as Asian and Mexican immigrants is because it's NOT ALLOWED to criticize their collective psychosis. Gender based, age based, ideologically based discussion is permitted in all walks of academic life. Race is taboo. Unless of course one merely pants the same old tired, liberal party line. I could go on and on.... Quote from Pabst: White folk who've never lived with blacks are the bleeding hearts. Those of us who've grown up in "changing" neighborhoods can attest that many blacks are vicious, racist garbage. certainly not all. But it's a numbers game. If let's say 15% of all white people are complete pricks I'd say about 40% of blacks fall into that category. [/QUOTE]
The only point I see here is you went out of your way to point out a discrepancy in race from an article that doesn't have any mention of it. Unlike the press, who profits from "selling" you the news, the police have no motivation to withhold or interject information. There are federal law enforcement programs that pledge financial and man-power assistance to local authorities if they report a suspected race issue. Therefore, I have no doubt that they wouldn't pass up such resources unless they didn't feel they could provide proof. Which it doesn't seem, you have any reservations about bringing up the issue without any of the same. While there are examples of racially motivated crimes, this definitely is a poor example of one.
Is that a racist statement? Yes, it goes to race. If you say that 40% of the Republicans are neo-con war mongers who prefer tax cuts to socialism is that an anti Republican observation or perhaps a truism that you've discovered and stated? Is starkly delivered criticism prejudicial? It doesn't go to race. If one talks about the military and trade ambitions of China as being a threat to the future of the U.S., is that a tirade against the Chinese as a people? Is the government of China elected democratically? If not, how could you blame the people? One of the reason's blacks have failed to assimilate economically in American society on the same plane as Asian and Mexican immigrants is because it's NOT ALLOWED to criticize their collective psychosis. Gender based, age based, ideologically based discussion is permitted in all walks of academic life. Race is taboo. Unless of course one merely pants the same old tired, liberal party line. Collective psychosis of a an entire race of people. That is not racist? I could go on and on.... Quote from Pabst: White folk who've never lived with blacks are the bleeding hearts. Those of us who've grown up in "changing" neighborhoods can attest that many blacks are vicious, racist garbage. certainly not all. But it's a numbers game. If let's say 15% of all white people are complete pricks I'd say about 40% of blacks fall into that category. [/QUOTE] [/B][/QUOTE]
You're ignorantly missing the point. How do you know if the press would publish those accusations by the police? Ever hear of editing? And besides, even if the police don't know the motive, why did the Sun-Sentinel feel it must ignore the race of the victims. Because it wasn't important? LOL. Sure. Contrast this story with the nationally covered story from SoFla last month of white kids beating to death one homeless black and severely injuring a homeless Hatian black and a Cuban. Of course the NAACP kind of blew it because revelations in the past week hint that these white boys also beat up an elderly white woman who was living on the streets. http://www.abcactionnews.com/stories/2006/01/060130beatings.shtml
There's a CLEAR differance between "racial" and "racist". Yes, and in my view, you are CLEARLY a racist. Who said it did? I asked if it were a predjudical statement? Answer MY questions, don't make up your own an then attribute them to me. The discussion was about race, not ideology. Your red herring doesn't wash, nor does it exhonerate your racism or racist attitudes. Is the government made up of Chinese Asians? Yes. So you admit that one can critisize the acts of the Chinese without it constituting race baiting? You can criticize the leaders of China for their actions, but not on the basis of their race. To do so is racist. Not at all. Did I say it was BECAUSE they're black? If I say we should tackle the problem of sickle cell anemia am I racist? Sickle Cell is biological in nature, and supported by scientific analysis. A claim that there is some psychosis of an entire race is not supported by biologists and their work, and is therefore racist in nature. Were you a scientist who could show some research that would filter out other factors in order to draw a scientifically valid conclusion, that would be one thing. You are not a scientist, you are simply a racist who espouses his own racist viewpoints. I don't believe your racism is a psychosis of whites, I think it is a personal choice, where you fix the facts and personal observations to fit your racist world view. [/B][/QUOTE] [/B][/QUOTE]
Oh, Pabst... Damn. I am sorry to learn that this quote is attributable to you, man. That wrecks my day. I would not have expected something like this out of your mouth.