No Court will interfere with Congress's impeachment power. If the Court were to contemplate overstepping its bounds re impeachment, the present Congress would pass specific legislation forbidding it to interfere. [Should you naively think this not possible, read again your nations constitution.] I sincerely doubt any Court would want to invite the Congress to do that, as it could open the door to all manner of Court limiting statutes. It would be another Marbury vs. Madison moment. Last time, the Court prevailed because Congress did not stop it. This time would be different. The Congress would jealously guard its Constitutional rights when it comes to The Power of Impeachment.
Says the "scientist" who pretends to practice law here without a license and has been wrong on just about every legal issue we have discussed. How many times were you wrong about every law and law suit about Trump while he was in office. He finished his term. By the way... I suspect piezoe is a good person too. He just has to supplement is Social Security payments by posting hard left postions for lefty organizations. (and he also defends the FED) leading me to believe he works for a soros funded group. I hope you are getting at least 50 cents a post.
I read the case, saw the video, and researched constitutional remedies/punishments for violations. Haven't read the decision. IMO: I'm thinking SC believes this is a very political clause, and it should have been an impeachment, and not in the courts; and that bringing it to the courts was an attempt to circumvent the impeachment threshold/process.
Didn't ExGoper admit he worked for Soros? I think he posted one time on Twitter that he did. These ET trolls trying to sound like smart guys when we know full well they are paid hacks and nothing else. Funny when they get blown out of the water when their lies are debunked over and over.
Agree. It was, in effect, dismissed on "lack of subject-matter jurisdiction" grounds, imo, and without reading the decision.