Emini divergence journal

Discussion in 'Journals' started by no_pm_please, Aug 5, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    I admire you for being able to stay in a trade for so long. Your system would drive me absolutely batshit.
     
    #271     Aug 14, 2003
  2. This trade is driving me nuts. Don't think I haven't thought about bailing out many times. Much easier to find these trades in the past and papertrade them than to sit on your hands in realtime.
    One way or the other it'll be over in an hour and 5 min.
     
    #272     Aug 14, 2003
  3. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    I've found that with most of the methods I've tried, a timestop is nearly always appropriate. A certain amount of energy is required to move the price in a certain direction, and sideways movements beyond a certain length tend to bleed off that energy, making the outcome more and more a matter of chance rather than what the setup intended.

    This, incidentally, is the same dynamic as that in, for example, a coil that goes on too long, or a flag that goes on too long, or an "opening range" breakout that occurs hours after the opening range was established.
     
    #273     Aug 14, 2003
  4. How do you go about figuring out how much time to give a trade? I've had quite a few of these long trades this year. When people say trading doesn't require any effort, they can't see my gut while waiting for the trade to end. One minute I think it's going to work out and the next I think it's headed for the rocks.
     
    #274     Aug 14, 2003
  5. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    That's the hard part. This morning, for example, I had a trade on for twenty minutes. That, for my method, is WAY too long, i.e., if price doesn't go within six or eight minutes, then I'm more likely to be stopped out or stuck in a lengthy sideways movement (which I have to babysit). So I just bailed at BE and went to the store.

    But the way you've set up your system, I don't know that it would work. OTOH, since you've been using it for so long and have been so successful with it, I'd just leave it the hell alone.

    A note: is there any way at all that you can determine what your exit is going to be, more or less, so that you don't have to babysit the trade? If you could leave, then the length of time wouldn't bug you.
     
    #275     Aug 14, 2003
  6. Moved buy limit order down to 985.50 (just in case I get lucky). The pickup in volatility has the Keltner bands expanding.
     
    #276     Aug 14, 2003
  7. If you used Bolinger bands on the 5m
    chart it would have gotten you out
    around 1:45 central at 986.75.
    I use BBands to show me volitility.
    I don't see Keltner bands squeezing
    much as I look back at your 5m
    setup that I've been following with the
    thread.

    What does Keltner do for you that is different from BBands?

    thanks,
    jd
     
    #277     Aug 14, 2003
  8. Canceled the limit order. Keltner bands are growing on each bar. I can hang there for another half hour and use a market order to exit it if its a winner. If the trade isn't done by 314, then I'll exit the trade within the last minute of the day (I don't do overnites).
     
    #278     Aug 14, 2003
  9. I guess it's just what you're used to. I've looked at BBands and they jump around too much for my tastes. I'm sure someone else would do just fine with them.
     
    #279     Aug 14, 2003
  10. Thanks no pm.
    Maybe that's a good thing....that the
    Keltner channels don't change much
    during the usual timeframe of your
    trades. Could you somehow use that
    as your way of projecting your target
    price in advance and just walk away?

    If I look back over your trades with us
    here on the thread, it looks like you
    could have been within a few ticks
    of the actual price that hit the channel
    on each exit. Have you investigated
    this idea? Not that it would have
    gotten you out of today's trade any
    sooner, but you could have entered
    the limit price and not had to worry
    over it.

    Just a thought.
    jd
     
    #280     Aug 14, 2003
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.