then its surprising kerry or obama have not claimed such ignorance. obama is famous for learning things in the press for the first time. maybe they actually had to type in her non state department address the first time they sent her something.
LOL, Howard Dean celebrates Hillary's honesty, claims she wasnt paid ovr 200k per college apearance, gets embarassed alll in one segment, This is the blinders your typical hillary fan comes to the table with.
Dean is just following the Clinton plan. Under Bill Clinton blatant lying became an art form. The media even came up with the term "factoid" to describe lies the Clintons told about things that could have been true but weren't. If you largely depend on low information voters, ie Obama supporters, and party hacks, lying about things that are easily proved wrong is not really a problem. It's not like the media will ever call you on it.
Max you should be careful with your expectations here because the last two presidential elections showed the country is clearly dumb enough to elect someone like Hillary. I would say it is the most likely thing to occur. Sorry bro. The country turned leftist and its going to be a constant struggle going forward just to hang on the your assets, firearms, personal property and personal safety. Its best to just hedge and setup to hide or defend all of those things.
yes... these emails were just like Benghazi.... when it comes to our security.. she is not just negligent she is reckless in the criminal sense of the word. She had at best a reckless disregard for her duties and the security of our nation. Most likely she was a sold out traitor in the benedict arnold sense of the word traitor. Hillary Snowden. http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...er-more-top-secret-clinton-emails-are-coming/ ... “I have never read anything that’s more sensitive than what these emails contained,” he said. “They do reveal classified methods. They do reveal classified sources, and they do reveal human assets. I can’t imagine how anyone could be familiar with these emails, whether they’re sending them or receiving them, and not realize that these are highly classified.” That comment was a reference to Clinton’s defense that she didn’t realize much of the material passing through her email server was classified, because it wasn’t marked as such. (That may be a consequence of her aides stripping the classification markings away when they copied the material out of secure computer systems.) As Secretary of State, Clinton received training in how to spot classified information and was obliged to report mishandling of it. Stewart didn’t think much of Clinton’s “nothing I sent or received was marked classified” defense. “It’s a ridiculous assertion,” he said. “If I received an email saying, ‘Here’s the names and addresses and phone numbers of ten of our undercover agents in Pakistan,’ I would know that was classified. I wouldn’t look for a heading and go, ‘well, there’s no heading on there, therefore it’s unclassified.'” Stewart stressed this example of ten undercover agents in Pakistan was purely hypothetical, and none of Clinton’s emails actually listed that precise information. Stewart said he was “shocked” when he saw exactly what was contained in the Clinton emails, although he allowed that he had a general idea of what they contained before viewing them. Notably, Stewart flatly refuted Clinton’s assertion that she neither sent or received any of the classified emails. “They were her emails,” he said. While waiting for a “legal process” to play out in the Clinton email case, Stewart said he thought the American people should ask themselves, “Did Hillary Clinton demonstrate the judgment, and the respect for protocol, that would allow her to protect national security?” He found himself doubting Clinton’s judgment when he read those emails and saw “how she has exposed some of the most sensitive information, or potentially exposed that.”
Hillary probably didn't want right-leaning people close to the military industrial establishment to be able to view her emails and that's one reason she had the private server. What she did with it, who knows. We'll have to take someone else's word for it, which is disturbing because two Senators on the Intelligence Committee already disagree.