From theft of classified documents to insider trading to looting of sensitive labor data... lol...that's how you make America Great Again. 'This is very bad': Whistleblower reveals 'brazen' DOGE team looting sensitive labor data A whistleblower has revealed that engineers with the Department of Government Efficiency had smuggled out highly sensitive data they had accessed from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The DOGE employees arrived at the agency's headquarters in early March and immediately reviewed its data to ostensibly to maximize efficiency and identify costs to cut, but whistleblower Dan Berulis told Congress that technical staff members believed their actions within those sensitive systems looked like what criminal or state-sponsored hackers might do, reported NPR. “The amount of data that was taken is the equivalent to a section of the New York Public Library, and the amount of people it could impact is in the hundreds of millions,” Berulis said. “Our information systems appear to have been assaulted and someone with the capacity and mandate to investigate needs to do so.” The DOGE team may have been granted access to sensitive information on unions, ongoing legal cases and corporate secrets – all of which labor law experts say should never leave the agency – and the employees working under Elon Musk asked that their activities not be logged on the system and apparently tried to cover their tracks. "I can't attest to what their end goal was or what they're doing with the data," Berulis told NPR. "But I can tell you that the bits of the puzzle that I can quantify are scary. ... This is a very bad picture we're looking at."
Oh, maybe not if you order that stuff from Tesla or even after market brand names. Yep, unfortunately a lot of people try to fake it till they make it and use credit stupidly. A lot of people were brought up using credit and if they can afford the weekly or monthly payments, they never think of the total cost vs cash.
If I can't get laid using DM's nobody can. For those who have not been following the news, Musk has been direct messaging random women on X/Twitter stating he wants to impregnate them. X Is Ditching DMs Hours After News of Musk Messaging Women About Impregnating Them Breaks https://www.latintimes.com/x-ditchi...g-women-about-impregnating-them-breaks-580936 The morning after reports surfaced that Elon Musk sent direct messages offering to impregnate women on his social media platform, a software engineer at the company revealed that X's direct messaging feature will be discontinued. Zach Warunek, a young software engineer at X, responded to a user who asked him to look into a bug they had noticed in their messages. Warunek's answer came as a shock. "The page will be deleted soon. So, no," he said. "So no more message requests?" the user asked, believing just the separate folder for messages from unknown accounts would be removed. "No...like the whole entire DM's will be gone soon," Warunek stated. Another user chimed in, suggesting the change was related to a Wall Street Journal piece published Tuesday night about Elon Musk. "Bit of an overreaction to delete dms cause Elon got denied by a Asian chick don't ya think?" the reply accused. The "chick" referred to by the user is cryptocurrency influencer Tiffany Fong, who Musk followed on X in September 2024. In November, Musk reportedly sent her a direct message asking if she'd like to have his child, according to WSJ. She declined, citing her hope to eventually have a more traditional family, but she discussed the proposition with select people. The lack of discretion reportedly irritated Musk and he unfollowed her. The revelation was one of many tidbits within a larger report, centered on Musk's treatment of the mothers of his (at least) 14 children, particularly Ashley St. Claire—the conservative influencer who called Musk out publicly after she had his baby. The article detailed the philosophy, financial arrangements and expectations behind Musk's mission to personally repopulate the globe with a "legion" of high IQ individuals. While the claim that Fong or the inflammatory report motivated the removal of direct messages is only circumstantial speculation, Musk continues to demonstrate a unique aptitude for attracting controversy. Musk has not responded to the comment, or to the WSJ report, other than a brief, disparaging tweet implying that the WSJ is worse than the gossip site TMZ.