To my ear she is not defending hedge funds or the wealthy at all here. She makes it clear they could be part of the so-called redditt army themselves, playing the other side, and that we don't know, and we need an SEC that observes and puts limits on their gamesmanship for the sake of what we might call traditional capitalism. The heroes of this story, the little guy investors giving it to the man, are in danger she says.
Ricter, your buddy Freddy Foreskin had a lot of trouble answering a simple question, maybe you can help me out a little. What exactly does she mean when she says it wasnt an honest market? The entire order flow was transparent and people chose to buy, sell, to step aside based on what was happening. She says a lot of people lost a lot of money. Yeah, happens every day. Where has she been? I know exactly where this heading. Do you? I love these politicians who are against the 'Wall Street Casino', but are quite supportive of actual fucking casinos. Surprisingly, it has something to do with money.
I get it! But casinos don't change the roulette wheel depending on who's spinning it. Or do they? I have not yet been a billionaire gambler.