The use of nuclear weapons, I assume for war...would be covered by International law for warfare....If they would be misused that would most likely be illegal Interesting that your reply with a sound logical challenge gets immediate likes from all the others that got lost in this conversation....they are hiding behind your skirt
In your scenario, was US blockading Mexico citizens from leaving the country? Landlocking them? Then relentlessly bombing refugee camps? if not, your scenario is irrelevant to the discussion.
So being 'pro life' is all about the law for you and not because of your feelings about children's lives?
?????? We are all have inalienable rights Laws are made to protect my right from interfering with your rights I believe a fetus also has rights. If you shoot and kill a fetus you will be charged with murder of that fetus because they are protecting the inalienable rights of the fetus At what point do the inalienable rights of the fetus interfere with the rights of the Mother......its a tough question....at 3 months, at nine months....never ?
Its lonely stuck in that logical corner ...so you decide to fight your way out by becoming the language police