No. The role of the press is to report on what a candidates positions or statements are. Then the people decide. Reflect upon that. If the press wants to report on it fairly and then editorialize against it, then they can do that. Similarly, if a conservative or any media interviews a candidate who - for example- says that someone with a dick is now a woman- then they should not filter out what the candidate says just because it obviously is contrary to science. Again, they are free to editorialize against it separately if they wish.
since we’ve proven that you don’t need political experience to be president, Michelle would be an excellent president of the US.
That’s pretty binary thinking by you, buddy. It’s obviously more complicated than just print whatever nonsense, hate speech, or incitement a candidate says and walk away. I’m not saying ABC News is right or wrong here just News outlets should be mindful of how their platform is being used. And as I have stated in my previous post, the Dominion lawsuit shows “candidate positions” is not a defense for liability.
Did ABC state that they edited him out because he was slandering someone or because they disagreed with his position? The reality is that these networks are part of the Biden team and the word has gone out that RFG is to be made a non-entity and invalidated on everything right from the get-go. If Marianne Williamson wants to come out and say that she thinks that COVID can be cured with essential oils, then they should be reporting that or showing the interview. If she slanders someone, she is liable but principle cannot be use for the press to pick through what parts of an interview will be shown and will not be shown. What if she says, "humans born male are male and not women." Are they going to edit that out because that does not match your science? RFK is free to criticize the government, and the CDC, the science, etc. If he or anyone else slanders someone by directly saying that they did something they did not do, then they are liable, if proven. But that cannot be turned around to say that since liability was close to being proven in the Dominion case that RFK and others must be shut down. Anyway, as I said, we know the drill. The orders have gone out to the lefty media cut to RFK's legs off and that order has been carried out by ABC. So they will get their extra potato in their rations. ABC is lookin' out for me.
It’s so intellectually weak to say some media organization is team Biden because they used discretion in what they choose to air. How about Junior is just irresponsible is just the cause? There’s been too much of this hiding behind “political speech” to drag the country into the gutter as is. The amount of disinformation swirling around related to guns, climate change, Covid, January 6th has dragged the country into a ditch we can’t get out of. People deserve to know the truth and spreading lies and disinformation under the guise of “political speech” needs to be curbed wherever it is.
So what if the dems held debates and RFK stated his views there and ABC was the host network running the debates. They are going to shut him down or delete it out of the recorded copies or what? Oh, I see. No debates. Problem solved. ABC lookin' out for us. And as we have learned from past experiences too, these lefty networks shut down and exclude any comments or responses from people that refer to Hunter's laptop- because "that is spreading Russian disinformation." And "50 former intel senior officials have confirmed this." Heh. Yeh. We are lucky to have the lefty press lookin out for us. And you are doing your part too- making sure that only administration-approved information reaches us. THANK YOU! You and your ilk have saved millions of people from the rigors of deciding for themselves.
Hunters laptop, still waiting on the House hearings on that or did they happen yet? What’s going on there? I was promised “more to come.” Live tv is obviously different but I remember a lot of talk with Trump in the debates about live fact checking him because he was so dishonest. But that’s how you like it, is t it? Some people just want to see the world burn and all of that.
Yeh well, in the area of "more to come" perhaps you missed out on the fact that even your lefty sources such as The Washington Post and The New York Times have come around and somewhat apologized for their role in burying the truth of whether or not that was/is Hunter's laptop. So that is where that saga is. You might want to give up the ghost on that a bit. The updated "more to come" is that Treasury was forced to cough up all of the suspicious activity reports on Hunter. So now- between the laptop contents, the testimony of Hunter's partners, and all the bank accounts and transactions uncovers in the SAR's takes us to Joe Biden's door. BIGTIME. So your new task now is to start denying all of that and branding it as Russian disinformation and we cannot talk about it because, well, the Dominion lawsuit proves x,t,z, or whatever. Ditto for the ABC's of the world and the rest of the lefty media, their task now is prevent reporting on that and if anyone goes off the reservation in an interview and speaks to it, well, shut them down or edit it out. Whatever the instructions from the DNC or the White House are. Sure, we can talk about "more to come" all you want. And note that I did not even mention that Hunter is about to be charged for several crimes. So maybe I will save that for your next update. In regard to House hearing, the house is scheduling an appearance by the IRS whistleblower who wants to testify that the IRS received instructions/interference from senior leadership telling them to back off the Hunter investigation. So there is a little something for you to watch and start preparing your various ways of going into denial. MORE TO COME.
while that argument holds water, it rings hollow when they're not exactly platforming the other candidate w/o a shot, who's not campaigning on crazy. In fact, they openly mock her.