Election 2024 Foreplay

Discussion in 'Politics' started by TreeFrogTrader, Feb 1, 2023.

  1. UsualName

    UsualName

    Hah. Then who would pay the freight? Not your ilk.
     
    #1741     Oct 24, 2023
  2. UsualName

    UsualName

    Don’t be such a jellyfish. Leaving NATO has zero merit unless you are actually looking end western civilization.
     
    #1742     Oct 24, 2023
  3. It has nothing to do with what I think or the merits of his position.

    I just made the point that he just walked into another issue that will require lots of splainin' and will be an energy sink for him. He has couple of those going already. As the saying goes "in politics if you are explaining, you are losing." That's all.

    So you retort back by making my point.

    NATO is legitimately criticized for failure to pay fair share, but a candidate has to be careful how they handle the suggestion of not having European partners. Not saying they cannot question that. Just sayin', the opposition is going to have fun with it so make sure you have a plan for it rather than just step into the doo-doo.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2023
    #1743     Oct 24, 2023
  4. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

     
    #1744     Oct 24, 2023
  5. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    upload_2023-10-24_14-33-55.png
     
    #1745     Oct 24, 2023
  6.  
    #1746     Oct 24, 2023
    UsualName, Tony Stark and Atlantic like this.
  7. UsualName

    UsualName

    Not Donald Trump’s Chief of Staff either…

     
    #1747     Oct 24, 2023
    Frederick Foresight likes this.
  8. UsualName

    UsualName

    You I don’t know if Trump is changing the psyche of our nation so much as amplifying the anger coming from what used to be the conservative right.

    These guys, Reagan, Bushes, even Romney and McCain all tapped into to this anger for political gain without thinking about how it would impact the future of the Republican Party. Now the Republican Party has no ideology beyond outrage and anger. It’s just a contest among politicians that can feed the proverbial beast the most hate.

    What is nice is the current situation in the House is highlighting how much this ideology cannot even do basic governing.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2023
    #1748     Oct 24, 2023
    Frederick Foresight likes this.
  9. Oh pooh.

    It highlights how difficult it is to run the house with an ultra-thin majority.

    Your ilk would love to have that problem in the house.

    Let us know when you get there. OR NOT.

    The progressive/hamas wing is just waiting for the dems to have an ultra thin majority so that they can make your life and Biden's life miserable. Except they do not have a majority yet and Biden may not even be there after 2024 so there is that.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2023
    #1749     Oct 24, 2023
  10. UsualName

    UsualName

    Nonsense. Pelosi ran the House with just as slim of a majority with great success. If anything all you’re doing is reinforcing my point of how there is no political ideology in the Republican Party. It’s just a mob.
     
    #1750     Oct 24, 2023
    Frederick Foresight likes this.