ECHOtrade merging with Van Buren

Discussion in 'Prop Firms' started by JeffreyECHO, Jul 1, 2002.

  1. Wow!!! That is big news!!! That is going to be one heck of a firm, two big boys like this coming together. Congrats to all involved, sounds like a big win for all the ECHO and VB people. I might have to check out the Santa Monica office, someone told me it is down by 3rd Street Promenade. Would make for a fun trading vacation there. :)
     
    #21     Jul 1, 2002
  2. What exactly did Vito and Jeff mean when they say "proprietary trading tools at VB"? Does this refer to software or trading strategies or something else?
    Thanks.
     
    #22     Jul 1, 2002
  3. Will costs/commissions come down due to new synergies?
     
    #23     Jul 1, 2002
  4. Babak

    Babak

     
    #24     Jul 1, 2002
  5. mjt

    mjt

    How many offices does VB have? Where are they located? (I assume that these will all remain open)
     
    #25     Jul 1, 2002
  6. Santa Monica, CA (LA area)

    San Diego

    Chicago

    San Fransisco


    Robert
     
    #26     Jul 1, 2002
  7. pat each other on the back.
     
    #27     Jul 1, 2002
  8. Speculator1929

    Speculator1929 Guest

    The trader gets more locations and software that works the way it should in the first place... I figure less competition for the trader dollars so less pressure on rates. Seems as if the benefit here is to the two firms being able to split overhead and make a few more dollars. Sorry to ruin the party or am I all wrong here? Seems as if this thread is being "spun" by four or five posters with a vested interest in this deal.
     
    #28     Jul 1, 2002
  9. mjt

    mjt

    Those four locations Robert listed...doesn't Echo already have office locations there? Are there going to be two locations in each of those cities?
     
    #29     Jul 1, 2002
  10. If there were less pressure on rates, then it doesn't explain why they are lowering rates (Eliminating ECN fees) right off the bat. It seems to me that in this market a lot of powerful firms are merging their back-office operations, probably a lot of it due to the cost savings involved -- ie: Datek and Ameritrade, also E-trade and Tradescape. Looks like just another merger along these lines. If they are creating a larger firm and lowering their costs through a merger and passing along those savings to the traders, I don't see where the "spun" part comes into play.

    If they were hiking rates, eliminating software choices, or doing something at all detrimental to the traders and everyone was happy I would feel like it was "spun." But I think traders at either place truly realize only benefits from this. I have been looking for a downside and have yet to see one. That's my humble opinion at least.
     
    #30     Jul 1, 2002