Dumb liberal/progressive - here is why you may face "the squad"!!!! If you have a brain,then answer what is the difference between these "articles?" http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...rty-stirs-disturbing-echoes-of-the-1940s.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...-curbs-pose-mounting-risk-to-commodities.html This is just one example! Do you see the difference? In the first case - absolutely no discussion is allowd...but, in the second link...oh, yeah, discussion is allowed. In the first case the "far right" Jobbik party is derided/discussed, but in the second link the economics of China placing curbs on growth are discussed?!?! To the "rest" of the world it may look like the "far right" is the problem in the first link...without ever discussing that fascism is the close twin of communism!!! What is the difference? One is private ownership of resources with gov't control of said resources, while the other is gov't ownership of resources with gov't control of said resources. You can debate the ownership of the resources, BUT NOT THE CONTROL OF RESOURCES!!! That my DUMB LIBERAL/PROGRESSIVE ENEMY is why the left will/should face "the squad!!!" Elitist dumb fucks think they can control the debate by controlling the media. It is FAR TO LATE for elitist control!!! This is but one example of the elitists' idea that they control the media - their apparent ownership of the Telegraph in the UK.! -gstropod My take on the first link: "Oh, fascists should be derided - they should NEVER be allowed to exist - no discussion allowed!" Only promote communists for the present capitalist countries! My take on the second link: " Oh, you can debate how the "smarter folk - aka Communist party" doles out "rights" and "credits," but it is still up to the communists to control the resources!