As I said the specific mechanism is irrelevant in the context of this discussion. The correlation between the cause (tick bites/Islam) and effect (lime disease/terrorism) is what matters and it's scientifically valid in both cases.
Say it as much as you like, it simply is not true. Involuntary responses on a biological level are just not an equivalent of voluntary responses on the mental level.
Say it as much as you like, it simply is not true. Involuntary responses on a biological level are just not an equivalent of voluntary responses on the mental level.
Say it as much as you like, it simply is not true. Involuntary responses on a biological level are just not an equivalent of voluntary responses on the mental level.
Say it as much as you like, it simply is not true. Involuntary responses on a biological level are just not an equivalent of voluntary responses on the mental level. Fallacy of a false equivalency.
Q: What is the equivalence fallacy? A: An Equivalence fallacy is the error of defining distinct and conflicting items in similar terms, thus equating two items that are not, in fact, equal.
Q: What is the equivalence fallacy? A: An Equivalence fallacy is the error of defining distinct and conflicting items in similar terms, thus equating two items that are not, in fact, equal.