Thanks....but I don't agree with the link you posted. For one thing, the charts that Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai displays at 39 min into the video, the first chart, did NOT show a downward sloping line, but a more random, scattered view, and that was of the same type of data, only with ballots not suspected of being influenced by an algorithm. Those suspected of the influence of the algorithm had a very different pattern, and those differences were repeated in other counties.
You mean this chart? The entire point of the article is that you HAVE to expect a negative sloping line, of course it wont' show what the email inventor showed because he is making shit up.
This nonsense has already been debunked by multiple PhD specializing in statistics and multiple fact checking sites in detail. You really should go look at these easily found sources .
No, I was referring to these charts. Supposedly of the same type of data and chart set up, different counties, but the second one has a clear slope down that should not be there.
"There would only be a flat line if the difference between likelihoods to vote down-ballot Republican and Republican President are exactly the same for Democrat and Republican voters."
This Tweet is just a sign of how off the rails Trump is. No, Dominion voting machines did not cause widespread problems https://www.chicagotribune.com/elec...0201112-dfhvga5uzjatdah2azb3fytlaa-story.html
There was no proof in the article. Obviously written by a journalism reject. You do realize that journalists are no different than the average moron you meet in the street right? Jack Nicas knows nothing about cyberwarfare. Plus he's from San Fransicko, so obvious CCP libtard.
I think I'll just stop watching and speculating on how this will all play out. A few more days and we should (?) know more. Hope this doesn't drag on endlessly. I don't know what to make of this tweet regarding Arizona's court hearing today: