Dorman,Openecry,Trademaven,Ninja

Discussion in 'Index Futures' started by ssss, Feb 2, 2007.

  1. ssss

    ssss

    Gentlemen

    Your opinion to points ,mentioned belov would appreciated

    1.Platform

    Openecry,Dorman,Ninja are all .net based -that is source of instability .Ninja have most volume of downloading and demanded to shut down each another application
    Openecry and Dorman not demanded that.

    OEC some 1.5 mb ,Dorman some 5 mb

    Which of is most speedy ? Dorman through good clearing ?
    (or that all only promoution) OEC with Esignal ?
    Dorman can be centered (price bar -static)

    TM (some 5mb) is without .net and possible most stable ,but
    some dissadvantaged in speed through PATS datafeed
    in volatile market ?

    2. FCM -that are all FCM ,all used information about client behaviar (that is not forbidden) and trade against clients
    interess .

    On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:37:48 -0600, <xxx@trademaven.com>
    said:
    > Thanks for your Reply,
    >
    > TradeMaven is a Futures Commission Merchant (we report and balance all of
    > our own trades) and we run a proprietary trading team trading company
    > funds.
    >
    3. How great can be commission for e-mini for 1000
    sides per month ,without any exchange and clearing fees ?

    Your respectfully
     
  2. What are you talking about? Dorman uses Ninja Trader as a front end. I used to use it. Now I use NT with TT data. Both are good data providers I just like more than 1 guy on the trade desk. Zen Fire is lightening quick though, no doubt. You need to expand to X Trader from TT while you are at it.

    I think you are quite confused on Dorman after re-reading your post. They are the clearing firm. And one of the oldest.
     
  3. ssss

    ssss

    What are you talking about? Dorman uses Ninja Trader as a front end. I used to use it. Now I use NT with TT data. Both are good data providers I just like more than 1 guy on the trade desk. Zen Fire is lightening quick though, no doubt. You need to expand to X Trader from TT while you are at it.

    Dear Sir

    Do you mean that NJ better as Dorman original platform(you can try demo real time) for discretionary trader ?

    Author first impression no ...

    Dorman offer platform as NJ,Dorman,X &
     
  4. nkhoi

    nkhoi Moderator

    I have no probl with OEcry, in what way it " is source of instability"?
     
  5. I would consider using them if I traded pit. I have heard alot of good thing about them and only 1 complaint aways back on this board.
     
  6. I can't understand your post so I can't comment?:confused:
     
  7. galiano

    galiano

    Dormans platform is T4, not Ninja. Dorman does offer Ninja however.

    http://dormantrading.com/cts_t4.shtml
    http://www.ctsfutures.com/content/t4/overview.aspx

    Problem with T4 (last time I checked) was a relatively high per-trade fee. Higher than NJ.

    As for .NET platforms, I used to have the same stability concern. Thats gone now thanks to good programming at OEC. And the RCG Onyx offering, which is .NET and uses PATS, is extremely stable too.
     
  8. Hey I learn something new every day. I started with Dorman electronic spring 06 and at the time, I believe, it was NT or nothing for electronic.

    I have heard good things about T-4, but no static dome, forget it. I pay TT their RT pittance for that feature alone.

    From the sound of X Trader 7.4, I may go back to the full TT very soon. Especially if they have a decent transactional model with 2 exchanges.
     
  9. galiano

    galiano

    Huh?
     
  10. ssss

    ssss

    I have heard good things about T-4, but no static dome,


    You must switched from smooth to centered ,it would static
    (price bar not moved)

    Author impression Dorman is better as NJ
    (author iinteressed only for discretionary trading)


    How great was commission difference betweeen NJ and Dorman ?

    Can expect 1$ per RT without exchange and clearing fees ?
    For 1000 side's per month ?


    Your respectfully
     
    #10     Feb 3, 2007