Dont fall for the “ compelling valuation “ nonsense

Discussion in 'Trading' started by brightside, Jan 20, 2022.

  1. I was never compelled about valuation or the risk neutral. Here's something interesting.The difference between the n th squares 1 apart is 2n+1 so if you take sqrt(0.5(p^2- 1)-0.5(p^2+1)) for p prime you can get the solutions to pythagoras like 11^2 is 61^2-60^2 or 5^2,12+13 so pygathoras is really about the centre of p^2 and the 2 exponent relates to when you are going to cross. Obvious in retrospect. It is odd some of the binomial coefficients and how the number sets of size k has the set size 2 say or any subset of a fixed sized exactly the same frequency. So in a measure space you can have very different partitions can't you for your conditional expectation. Finally the probabability that a given given integer is an undecideable statement of the Godel type is order much bigger than the power set of those which can be shown to be true or false.
     
    #11     Jan 21, 2022
  2. Nine_Ender

    Nine_Ender

    NY HOOD is an expert on losing all his money. You don't want to be him :).
     
    #12     Jan 21, 2022
  3. [​IMG]
     
    #13     Jan 21, 2022
    comagnum likes this.
  4. ^^^^^^ LOL, love it!!!
     
    #14     Jan 21, 2022
  5. There is much further downside. Wage inflation !
     
    #15     Jan 21, 2022