Donald

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Buy1Sell2, Dec 10, 2017.

  1. Yes, and they needed to do ten times better than a dem to even make it to the top half, so kudos to them.

    Contrast this with Obama who won the Nobel Peace prize for - literally- just running for President. Yeh, off to a good start there.
     

  2. Reagan and Eisenhower did not do better than Obama and Clinton.Reagan should be bottom 5 and Eisenhower should not be top 5.Obama wasn't bombing Iran or committing genocide when he won the Nobel prize.
     
  3. Those ratings are all bullshit anyway. Based on a grab-bag of whatever the alleged historian liked or did not like.

    Lyndon Johnson was a one term, highly disliked President whose ratings are dragged down by the Vietnam War and the fact that he was a gruff southern boy. Nevertheless, based on the times and what he had to work with he did more to advance dem causes than some dufus pretty boy like Obama did. Voting rights, all the other civil rights progress, all the various Great Society projects, social security, medicare etc.
     

  4. Those ratings are from professional historians,history professors,political scientist , etc

    I agree Lyndon Johnson should be higher,but as you stated the Vietnam War brought him down.Ratings factor in the good and the bad,not just good.

    The dufus Obama cut the deficit in half,rescued the country from the biggest economic crisis since the great depression,9 million jobs created,2nd biggest healthcare bill ever getting millions healthcare,Wall Street reform bill,cut military spending,increased taxes on the rich,only 1 of 6 Presidents to get 51% or more of the vote twice,ended the Iraq war,new Start treaty,Iran nuclear deal that was working great until Trump ended it,his Wall Street reform bill would have prevented the Silicon Valley Bank failure if Trump hadn't ended that,got Bin Laden,ended discrimination against gay people in the military,ended marriage discrimination against gay people etc
     
  5. Historians aren't the only ones who think Obama was a good President,so do the American people.


    upload_2025-8-21_9-13-23.png

    upload_2025-8-21_9-11-55.png






    upload_2025-8-21_9-18-49.png
     
  6. The dufus Obama cut the deficit in half (Trump increased the deficit from 665 billion to 2.7 trillion and will have over 15 trillion in new debt),rescued the country from the biggest economic crisis since the great depression,9 million jobs created(In Trumps 1st term he is the only President to have a net job loss),2nd biggest healthcare bill ever getting millions healthcare(Trump is causing millions of Americans to lose healthcare),Wall Street reform bill,cut military spending(Trump increased military spending) ,increased taxes on the rich(Trump cut taxes on the rich),only 1 of 6 Presidents to get 51% or more of the vote twice (Trump has never gotten the majority of the vote in 3 elections and is the only President to never have a 50% or higher approval on Gallup ),ended the Iraq war,new Start treaty,Iran nuclear deal that was working great until Trump ended it,his Wall Street reform bill would have prevented the Silicon Valley Bank failure if Trump hadn't ended that,got Bin Laden,ended discrimination against gay people in the military,ended marriage discrimination against gay people etc
     
  7. Yeh, whatevah.

    You could easily show data indicating that many American people think Kamala Harris was the best vice president in history and would have made a great president if elected and should run next time too.

    Nevermind that her intelligence, skills, and accomplishments were/are roughly equal to that of a Russet potato.
     


  8. Screenshot_2025-08-21-09-54-57-1.png
     
    Last edited: Aug 21, 2025 at 10:56 AM

  9. Unlike Obama election results and approval/ favorbility ratings show thats clearly not the case