Some dem appointed judges just struck down a law in North Carolina that said a voter has to have a valid ID. They said it discriminates against blacks. Whites can do it but blacks are incapable. Translation. The court says Kneeeeee Groooooooos are too freaking stupid to get an ID. Tell me again which party are racists.
Thought so. You're afraid of what might be in there. Nuff said. Republicans are also calling for him to disclose.
Yes. I won't pretend to know the details regarding the foundation, but I know it does good work. What I find puzzling is that people here who support Trump are defending his not disclosing his tax returns. How could that be? His business savvy is the very thing he purports to bring to the table. That's it. That's the only think that differentiated him from the other candidates. His tax returns would validate his claims of business and financial acumen. I think we both know enough about Trump to know that if the tax returns were in any way flattering, he would be quick to disclose them; it is his very nature to show off. Yeah, he's all about the sizzle, but where's the steak?
You probably know something that not even Hillary knows. If I am not mistaken, she omitted the Foundation's existence in her acceptance's speech.
What would you like for her to have said about it? She does not appear to have an active hand in running it. https://www.clintonfoundation.org/
or she prefers to save the embarrassment. You are welcome to illustrate yourself... EXCLUSIVE: IRS Launches Investigation Of Clinton Foundation RICHARD POLLOCK Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton speaks during the 107th NAACP National Convention in Cincinnati, Ohio, July 18, 2016. REUTERS/William Philpott IRS Commissioner John Koskinen referred congressional charges of corrupt Clinton Foundation “pay-to-play” activities to his tax agency’s exempt operations office for investigation, The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned. The request to investigate the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation on charges of “public corruption” was made in a July 15 letter by 64 House Republicans to the IRS, FBI and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). They charged the foundation is “lawless.” The initiative is being led by Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican who serves as the vice chairwoman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which oversees FTC. The FTC regulates public charities alongside the IRS. The lawmakers charged the Clinton Foundation is a “lawless ‘pay-to-play’ enterprise that has been operating under a cloak of philanthropy for years and should be investigated.” Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/26/e...tigation-of-clinton-foundation/#ixzz4Fp7XROjM Scandal Without End: Is The Clinton Foundation A Fraud? Have former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used their charitable foundation for fraudulent purposes? Some in Congress think so. (AP) Corruption: The Clinton Foundation's questionable money dealings have raised eyebrows for years. Now, a letter circulating in Congress alleges that the Clinton family's supposed do-gooder foundation is in fact a "lawless, 'pay-to-play' enterprise that has been operating under a cloak of philanthropy for years." Those are pretty tough words for a former president and his wife, who happens to be the leading candidate to be our next president. But the congressional letter, which the Daily Caller News Foundation got its hands on, was written by Republican Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., who plans on asking the FBI, IRS and Federal Trade Commission to launch a "public corruption" investigation. Is it warranted, or just politics? It sure looks like the former. As Blackburn's letter says, there is a "pattern of dealing that personally enriched the Clintons at the expense of American foreign policy." Blackburn cites the for-profit education business Laureate Education, which paid Bill Clinton some $16.5 million to serve part-time as "honorary chancellor" starting in 2010, a year after Hillary became secretary of state. Laureate, for its part, gave the Clinton Foundation some $1 million to $5 million. Nothing illegal about that, per se. However, the Daily Tennesseean reports that Blackburn's letter also details how "the International Youth Fund, whose board members include Laureate's founder, Douglas Baker, received more than $55 million in grants from the U.S. Agency for International Development while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state." AID is a part of the State Department. Then there's Uranium One. Hillary Clinton, the Daily Tennesseean notes, "was one of several Obama administration officials who approved the sale of uranium to the Russian-operated company, whose chairman also has donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation." A number of other people involved in the deal also gave money to the Clintons. "The appearance of 'pay-to-play' transactions involving Laureate and Uranium One also raises serious allegations of criminal conduct requiring further examination," Blackburn's letter says. That's not all of the questionable activities. As we noted back in May, the Clinton Foundation took in some $100 million in donations from a variety of Gulf sheikhs and billionaires who no doubt expected to reap political benefits from a future Hillary Clinton presidency, with Bill serving not just as first gentleman in the White House but also possibly as bagman. Among donors dumping bags of cash on the Clintons include Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. Lost in the shuffle is Bill Clinton's special "business partnership" from 2003 to 2008 with Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, the strongman ruler of Dubai. That deal netted Clinton some $15 million in "guaranteed payments," tax records show. And then there's the $30 million delivered to the Clintons by two Mideast foundations and four billionaire Saudis. For the betterment of humankind, no doubt. As national security analyst and writer Patrick Poole said in May, "These regimes are buying access. ... There are massive conflicts of interest. It's beyond comprehension." It took Wall Street financial analyst and investment advisor Charles Ortel -- whom the Sunday Times of London once described as "one of the finest analysts of financial statements on the planet" -- to untangle the mess in a series of ongoing reports. Ortel alleges that contribution disclosures by the foundation often don't fit with what donors' own records say -- big red flag. "This," Ortel summed up, "is a charity fraud." As a reminder, this isn't just some political vendetta. As far back as 2013, an alarmed New York Times warned that the foundation had become "a sprawling concern, supervised by a rotating board of old Clinton hands, vulnerable to distraction and threatened by conflicts of interest." It turns out that's a gross understatement. Testifying last week to Congress, FBI chief James Comey called Hillary Clinton "extremely careless" about her use of a private email server while secretary of state. But, curiously, he refused additional comment "on the existence or nonexistence of any other ongoing investigations." This needs to be disclosed. Americans deserve to know whether the person they're likely to put into the White House this November is merely a misunderstood career public servant -- or a pocket-lining career criminal. http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/scandal-without-end-is-the-clinton-foundation-a-fraud/
LOL, this is why I like you. You come up with some great one liners...err you were parodying the media, weren't you?
The request to investigate the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation on charges of “public corruption” was made in a July 15 letter by 64 House Republicans to the IRS, FBI and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). They charged the foundation is “lawless.” The initiative is being led by Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican who serves as the vice chairwoman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which oversees FTC. The FTC regulates public charities alongside the IRS. The lawmakers charged the Clinton Foundation is a “lawless ‘pay-to-play’ enterprise that has been operating under a cloak of philanthropy for years and should be investigated.” ----------- --------- Moar manufactured scandals.
do you have any Money on the election? you can get around 2-1 odds; not bad if you're so sure [i bet about 5 bitcoins on the woman] he could win but, at least today, i don't see how [if he somehow changes in the debates , he Might have a chance] marc