Donald Trump, leading in polls, leading in betting odds

Discussion in 'Politics' started by wildchild, Oct 7, 2023.

  1. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen

    I am objectively wrong/misinformed sometimes and I will admit to it, quite happily. In fact several times I have gone back to posts to correct the record.

     
    #31     Oct 7, 2023
  2. smallfil

    smallfil

    Special Counsel Robert Mueller himself who is 100% biased against President Donald Trump even said there was no evidence linking President Donald Trump to Russia. It is a bogus dossier that Hillary Clinton paid for that was used as the evidence. In addition, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton sold Russia US uranium. You know, the uranium used to make nuclear missiles? If anyone needs to be investigated for ties to Russia, it should be Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton but, no such investigation took place?
     
    #32     Oct 8, 2023
    Buy1Sell2 likes this.
  3. wildchild

    wildchild

    No you won't, you were wrong mislead for how many years about Russian collusion and still believe the lie.

    Since the Muller Report, that was supposed to prove collusion, the democrat party in its entirety has been completely silent about it. I wonder why.

    Hound of the Baskervilles indicator.
     
    #33     Oct 8, 2023
    smallfil likes this.
  4. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen

    The report was supposed to investigate suspicious behaviour and this it found. Not only by Trump but foreign enemy intrusion.

    It's not China where you start with the conviction and then present the evidence.

    Just like the ten Republican Benghazi hearings found some things that were not ideal but exonerated Hillary of actionable wrongdoing.

    I know you are not an educated man, the only interesting thing I can recall about you is that you once went to the Azores but try and understand that Trump DID court help from Russia, rather blatently.

    The question was did his breaking of norms which are what laws are but codified rise to a criminal level? Mueller left that question open for congress and senate to decide. It went over to politics then.
     
    #34     Oct 8, 2023
  5. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen

    You have to explain that, are you talking about Stapleton's nets? A big dog painted in phospherous? Can't have been very healthy for it.
     
    #35     Oct 8, 2023
  6. wildchild

    wildchild

    Sorry, just like ChatGPT, when Wildchild is feed info from sources that should be credible, fuck ups happen. It was the first trading book I read about 20 years ago and my memory is good, I still remember it.

    Alex Elder is going to have to take the L for this one. Page 106 through 108 are mistitled and the indicator misnamed. I accurately portrayed the information from the source, but the source happened to be incorrect.

    I was correct 99.456% of the time, this going to make it dip to 98.764. This was a pretty minor screw up so luckily it is not weighted too heavily. The problem is, once you are at my level you need a long string of successes just to get back to where you were.
     
    #36     Oct 8, 2023
  7. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    QUITE A GOOD POSTING
     
    #37     Oct 8, 2023
  8. Mercor

    Mercor

    This is Bugenhagen to this discussion

     
    #38     Oct 8, 2023
  9. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen

    Ah, it's a actual indicator. OK.
     
    #39     Oct 8, 2023
  10. wildchild

    wildchild

    Back to the topic at hand, Donald Trump is leading. It is hard to believe that Biden's response to the war in Israel going to help him much.
     
    #40     Oct 8, 2023