I also asked -can't you read- whether Loretta recused or not? Just a yes or no will suffice. No need to look for the full dnc script?
Is it that hard reading sentences that involves a bit of complexity? She didn't recuse from her job, she recused from making a judgement call, it's simple as that. No need to read your Cambridge Analytica response sheet, try parsing complex sentences. It's hilarious to think that anyone would pay to argue meatheads who think a life long conman is their savior from corruption.
I see. So you are saying that she removed herself from any involvement, influence, or authority over the final decision to prosecute or not prosecute Hillary. Is that correct? That is the judgement call we are talking about.
Can't you just read the article, you are so stuck to your narrative that even facts are unable to change it.
I have answered it many times, because you are stuck with your narrative, you are unable to parse English language.
Ok. Then my post #94 above summarzing your view stands uncorrected. I was just looking for your confirmation. Fine. More to say on that as we go forward. Especially since Lynch specifically said otherwise.
Given how susceptible you are to reading and quoting things partially, feel free to provide the quote to prove the contradiction
Bumping another fake news from the resident liar and conspiratard. This is the state of their 'journalism' and 'fake news'