>80% of Americans approved of Bush back then too. He killed a lot more innocent civilians than Bin Laden. Maybe you could list the % of muslims who have committed terrorist acts? It's like looking at Nazi party votes in 1933 and then concluding that something nasty has to happen to all Germans, just because they are German. Again, like AAA I would wager your personal experience with civilised muslims is very slim. You seem to think that the ones you met while in the IDF are representative of all of them. They're about as representative as Belfast catholics during the Troubles are of catholics worldwide.
there are no 'muslim-only' parts of the UK London's No-Go Zones no separate legal system UKâs first official sharia courts: ISLAMIC law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases. and practically no violence from muslims against society. July 2005 London bombings
The question we have to ask is do we want that here? Unlike all the editorials I read this weekend, it has nothing to do with "islamaphobia", ignorance, intolerance, etc. It is merely a question of do we want to deal with what has followed muslim immigration throughout europe? It seems to me we have enough problems. Why import more?
Hombre, well said. @Oktiri: I have no idea what a "real" muslim is (as you call yourself), but I happen to live beside a million of them and I can tell you that the vast majority (seriously, about 80%) of those I have encountered are intolerant, short fused, hateful, vengeful, and just plain pathetic excuse for human beings. If you want to tell me they are "bad" muslims and you are a "good" one, that's fine. But they probably would say the same about you. What makes your version more "real" then theirs?