Does Probability exist?

Discussion in 'Trading' started by game, May 3, 2015.

  1. Rajacar

    Rajacar

    Without good probabilities, it is a pure gamble, for many the stock market is a casino.

    With knowledge of correct timing and study of cycles you can increase your probability of winning. time and cycles are the Key!
     
    #111     May 9, 2015
  2. MarkBrown

    MarkBrown

    probability is like a perfect storm. it does exist in varying levels depending upon your ability, circumstances (luck) and willingness to accept the gift when presented. without this mix firing on all cylinders your stuck like a broken record "but past events". perfect storm participants are not hanging around anymore forcing acceptance of gifts here on et. the owner of this board and the mods have made sure of that and fucked it up for all of you.
     
    #112     May 9, 2015
    lucysparabola and fortydraws like this.
  3. Rajacar

    Rajacar

    Predicting exact stock market future Highs and Lows has been my passion and mission, but for many it is often futile, if not impossible. However, the probabilities increase with the right Timing and cycle tools. It is of course never an easy task. There are always many various Times and Cycles to consider that tips the scales either way. It is not only unique Time Change in Trends (CIT) that predict a market turn within +/-1 day that needs to be considered, but various precise Cycles, that predict exact Highs and Lows, +/-1 day, for both intraday and daily. I also take into account high probability Market Statistics, Elliott waves, Master Time Codes, etc. etc. The main goal for anyone should be is to find those high probability outcomes, otherwise we might just as well be in Las Vegas Casino
     
    #113     May 9, 2015
  4. Man is this moronic. Lets put up is down on a t shirt also.
     
    #114     May 9, 2015
  5. This posting got already 9 likes. Because most postings never get so many likes it confirms to me that what I wrote is supported by many traders. That means too that marketsurfers reaction was completely wrong. For me it was already clear from the beginning, but because I never think that I am always right (what some other posters do think about all their postings), I appreciate opinions from other members to see if I was right or wrong.
     
    Last edited: May 9, 2015
    #115     May 9, 2015
  6. Thanks, happy someone sees the light here. I finally realized, after extracting tremendous value from this site, that the anonymous parotbot "teachers" here are mostly losers in real life just trying to make themselves feel better by attracting more people to the wrong road that sounds so good, but is soooo wrong. Maybe they are CNBC shutins living fantasy lives or other ne'eerdowells and have no malicious intent. I have no clue. But it its sad however u look at it.
     
    #116     May 9, 2015
  7. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    You may want to limit that to members who are actually successful traders . . .
     
    #117     May 9, 2015
  8. Where's the testing and math that backs this up? You cant use terms like probabilities without extensive testing. Post the test, please, or this is nothing but feeel gooood platitudes. Surf
     
    #118     May 9, 2015
  9. Man, you are letting me down. Im bored sitting on the beach--- myst traders lose, so whenever u get many agreeing with u, the premise is just another feel good platitude impossible to act upon or guaranteed to lose if u can.
     
    #119     May 9, 2015
  10. Can you tell me how you know that I am a loser in real life? Am I male or female? Where do I live? How old am I? How long do I trade? Did you see my statements?
    On all these questions your answer should be NO. But it would not surprise that you would answer YES.
    With the arguments you post nobody can take you serious any more.

    You are not market surfer, you are the market smurf.


    [​IMG]
     
    #120     May 9, 2015
    fortydraws and lucysparabola like this.