really? after 7 years of you and Geppetto being moronic trolls, you are going to make this the STU pidest of statements.... you don't understand the most basic definition of this subject? try google you might learn something.
I really don't care who are what says the universe is fine tuned. They are wrong. It may "appear" to be fine tuned - which is actually what they are saying - but it is NOT fine tuned because that presumes a tuner................ and most of the top cosmologists are atheists.
odd... I thought the opposite of the sock puppet drone. it was typical of his exact stance on agw and other things contrary to leftist propaganda. he does not care what the science says because he makes up his own definition of what a greenhouse gas can do... and then he implies it can only warm, time and time again.. unless he is challenged... they he backs away... then he says it again on a new thread.
Except of course, it doesn't. "What is your motivation for being such a lying fraud?" "7 years being a moronic troll, you a make the stupidest statements" "try google you might learn something." Are or appear. Which one. It can't be both. The Earth IS flat or it Appears flat. Which is it, do you even understand that much ? "Let's see you back that up, mental midget."
We are dealing with a bunch of leftist trolls... who have no problem saying the most incredible dumb things... really stu? can't appear and be at the same time you appear to be a troll and you are a troll. the fire appears hot and is hot. the fundamental constants of the universe appear finely tuned and are finely tuned.
I must remind stu... that the point of the paper he presented was to mount a preliminary challenge to the virtually universally accepted idea that cosmological constant is fined tuned for life. [/QUOTE]