Dodd Says Short-Term Bank Nationalization Might Be Necessary

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by ASusilovic, Feb 20, 2009.

  1. Wow Nationalized banks and Auto industry.

    Holy shit!

    What is happening to this country. I guess empires fall. Look what happened to the Soviet Union.
     
    #11     Feb 20, 2009
  2. Where have you been, in a cave or something?
    Did you just wake-up from a 12 month coma?
    :D
     
    #12     Feb 20, 2009
  3. I think first nationalization of few worst banks is necessary, this should scare the hell out of other poor banks , whose management is sitting on their a$$ess waiting for more taxpayer money. This will force them to act aggressively, only then we will be out of this mess. Desperate times call for desperate measures.
     
    #13     Feb 21, 2009
  4. chartman

    chartman

    Quote from chartman:

    "This administration continues to strongly believe that a privately held banking system is the correct way to go, ensuring that they are regulated sufficiently by this government," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said when asked about nationalizing the banks.

    It's official. Nationalization will probably happen within the next month. Beware C and BAC stockholders. You are forewarned!

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The federal government is in talks to beef up its ownership stake in Citigroup to as much as 40 percent of the company's common stock, the Wall Street Journal reported Sunday—just days after the Obama administration said it didn't want to nationalize America's largest banks.

    Citigroup proposed the move to regulators, the Journal reported, and a Treasury Department spokesman signaled late Sunday that the government is open to the idea, even as he refused to discuss Citi directly.

    Treasury spokesman Isaac Baker told POLITICO: "We don't comment on conversations with specific banks. However. we are open to considering a request to [convert preferred stock to common shares] if the institution and its regulator believe it would promote the long term stability of that institution, and if we believe it's in the best interest of long term stability of our economy and financial system."

    That represents a dramatic change of tone from White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs on Friday. "This administration continues to strongly believe that a privately held banking system is the correct way to go, ensuring that they are regulated sufficiently by this government," Gibbs said at the time. "That's been our belief for quite some time
     
    #14     Feb 23, 2009