We have a difference of views. your post is a major revelation to me; I think that there are many many other people who have your orientation. thank God it is not prevalent at CERN. but since 2000 it may have been at MSFT. Apple has blasted past the moneyied MSFT by a factor of 20X. the basic stream of data that is used by those who create intellectual property that is valued comes from variables like: OHLC and volume. Add in the value of the consistent duration for those values. I see six. There are other things from other sources. Keep those in mind. Now, I better see the wall that separates those who create intellectual property of value from those who create results of little value. I'll use the debacle of MSFT as an example. The top gun made five divisions compete with one antoehr for the Relative value that was assigned to their performance. A spectrum where there were no ties etc. People who examine the decade have not done a good job either; they remain in the dark. I sit here about a decade ahead of everyone else in terms of using my magic wand to get results. What if the top gun at MASFT used a different incentivizer? for me it is a fifteen second solution to thier Proctor and Gamble emmulation. I won't keep you wondering. The incentive it to tabulate and relatively score the formal sharing of anything between the five divisions. Why can't ANY observer and ANY paid consultant shoot that one into place? What would have happened to MSFT IF they were sharing instead of competitively withholding to gain token recognition? All of them are dumb fucks as you now have learned. Steve Jobs in vented one thing and passed it across in a specific OOE to each part of Apple. Once I did a TFSE with 5 of my corps into one corp and I took control of the one corp. they had to go to the mail box and get checks. The P/E of the parent went up 100% per quarter as a consequence. So I am explaining how the world works to you. The stack is money, power and information which is on TOP. MSFT came in second with five ideas that Steve Jobs and other came in first with. No one uses the second place solution to these five ideas. MSFT has no surplus capital. Let us turn to your mental faux paw (the definition of a father in law). I have five streams of OOE's. Each is generated from data. The OOE's are interwoven. NO ONE can reverse engineer this fabric. You design each OOE once in your life. As I explained years and years ago, each stream is iteratively refined using a specific set of tools. Not one else uses this tools set either. If you remember, I have spoken about "steer and focus". I also have spoken about "waiting". Did you ever hear me suggest WWT? Have you ever heard about IBGS?. We are making a reconnection. I see you as a division head at a major corp. It is NOT the humor division. I have that covered with a group in Hollywood as you will find out soon enough. try to draw a pic of the above. See if you can see how data is empowered and becomes INFORMATION. reread the HATE to RISK thread where he recognizes he has a list of entires and exits down cold. BUT...BUT...BUT..... HE IS HAVING A LIZARD SYNDROME AND PEE PEE EXPERIENCE IN BETWEEN doing a bar by bar analysis. Read my suggestions. they are all based on RDBMS processing. Learn SQL. Learn howq tables feed SQL. Write the tables you need.
All that for little old me? Of course not. I know that. I am merely a noisily and noisomely vocal CWer. Glad to give you an excuse. And I know that you will be disappointed if I don't point out that your supposed DOF's in OHLC are aggregated from "last" on the tape. And "volume" is aggregated from "size" on the tape, as"consistent duration" is derived from time last and size.. All created for people too stupid or lazy or inattentive to watch a fast price display like one second. The superlatives of the above pejorative adjectives dwell on five minute. My trading, such as it is, is all about purity of presentation. Attached is the kind of purity I seek. Admittedly one second is still aggregated, but I am unable to process anything faster. At my advanced age. And I don't need any longer chart duration. I can't remember that far back.
i rescheduled with CNBC four times and then I cancelled. The TV environment is really an entertainment venue. The Jim cramer show is based on his success in CW and he can do quick views of anything by just using his approach. Public personalities usually come from having a lot of OPM in their history. How I relate is as a retailer who has been around for longer than most ever will be. It may be possible to communicate the system I use but so far, I find most people have worked to develop beliefs that are oriented to CW and CW has no yield compared to the market's offer. For them they believe that there is a safety in numbers nd the cluster is always going to be there.