IMHO this whole random walk "discussion" is nothing but a fishing expedition trying to entice someone else to disclose his/her thought pattern and deduce a system from that.
Personally, I'm here to read what MAESTRO kindly prints, and for the cappuccinos that whatsisnamePhD is going to bring me.
Thank you so much!!!! It was a nice evening! I took my wife to a nice place and we talked about our 27 years and everything we went through! It was perfect! I am a bit hang over today though, oh well ....
I would like to disagree, if I may. I think it is beneficial (at least for me) to have a place to express my ideas and create a fruitful discussion that may (or may not) spark a thought that I missed in the process of my research by being too close to the subject! I hope you, guys share this thought. We are also trying to keep the subject at the concept level and I doubt that we will get to implementation details that easily.
A very important thought! The reason why it is so important is because of the "repetitiveness" quality. There is a very little chance that a combination of factors in the future will be identical to what we observed in the past. I do not want to put the words in your mouth (because I might be wrong, there is always a chance for that) but I believe it is one of the strongest confirmations of inherent RANDOMNESS in the market. I actually will try to show later how it can be used reliably.
3^3 is powerful indeed! Did you know that all of the prime numbers belong to a set that could be described as 6N +/- 1 ?
Is that a rhetorical question?. We should get on with zeddoublenaught's post...since the conversation has been chit-chat ever since that post... :eek:
I agree. I am preparing the next set of arguments and simply need some more time. Also, being hang over does not help! Cheers, MAESTRO P.S. No, it wasn't rhetorical question. I will explain later.