Do You Have Balls? Goldman Sachs Is Breaking Down

Discussion in 'Stocks' started by ByLoSellHi, Sep 4, 2006.

  1. If you mean me (may be the OP) I'm not strongly bearish...mildly so for the reasons stated in Barrons but for a put calendar neutral will still work. My time frame is a couple of months...partly seasonal.
     
    #21     Sep 5, 2006
  2. I didn't think balls were a prerequisite to trading the markets...now where are mine....hummmmmm
     
    #22     Sep 5, 2006
  3. KS96

    KS96

    This call seems to be working ok. Anyone still short?
     
    • gs.png
      File size:
      22.6 KB
      Views:
      107
    #23     Sep 17, 2006
  4. looks like bound to, innit.
     
    #24     Sep 17, 2006
  5. by the way where's that massive cretin of commissario[?]

    hey coglione, look at the chart and eat shit.
     
    #25     Sep 17, 2006
  6. Any balls I had have been removed by galactically stupid talk of shorting GS.

    Live and learn.
     
    #26     Sep 17, 2006
  7. That was pretty ballsy if you really did short a week ahead of earnings.

    If you want to short ahead of earnings, maybe its better to check how the stock performed after its last earnings report or two. If it tanked last time, and has rebounded, then that is probably a better stock to take a shot at.

    Just my opinion. I mostly day trade and my overnight holds are usually hedged.

    Did you really short, or were you just testing the water with your original post?

    None of our business really, just curious.
     
    #27     Sep 17, 2006
  8. SellHiByHier.

    It does look short term bearish right now, tho ;)

    Not my cup of tea however.
     
    #28     Sep 17, 2006
  9. Let's not get crazy. :)
     
    #29     Sep 17, 2006
  10. osheag

    osheag

    7 updays - from $151 to $165 - from its 200 day moving average - GS looks rock solid to me
     
    #30     Sep 18, 2006