Do you gun law people also believe we should ban cars?

Rectum posts a lot of nonsense that is completely irrelevant.

Might as well get used to it. He's not going to get any better.

 

His brain keeps turning left but he hasn't figured out yet that will just take him in big circles.

 

Naturally, gun control opponents, having gotten "a single win", will now go full press for everything? ; )

You won a battle, yet you're not happy. We both know why.

 

There is little doubt in my mind that the next "grab" will be a two steps forward moment for the left.

 

Another massacre will certainly contribute to that possibility.

 

You're really having trouble dealing with this gun control issue loss.

Try back in about 10 years and we'll see if it goes anywhere then. In the meantime, expect a few of the state laws that have been passed to be overturned by SCOTUS.

 

Full press on what? Status quo? Because that's all we want.

Once again, it's an example of the Left trying to tell everyone else how they should live, and the conservatives saying "get the hell out of my life and leave me alone - I know what is best for me."

We won a battle I knew we would win. I've been saying nothing would get passed and nothing has. I am satisfied, and not unhappy at all.

 

Makes your pussy drip just thinking about it eh?

 

The left will never, ever accept this concept. For that reason, if the leadership of the right doesn't grow more balls, the left will eventually win. One step back, two forward. The ends justify the means. And so on...

In the end the left will lose, too. It won't be at the hands of the conservative right, but they will eventually sacrifice themselves at the altar of political correctness. Just look at the left wing (and some in the right) and their lapdog media today and what they don't report or haven't reported regarding Boston, Ft. Hood, and many other incidents. You see my point?

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


You did not answer the question bigarrow ask. He ask is this true. That is bigarrow question to this thread. Is this true from the link bigarrow post?



http://www.nationalmemo.com/how-the-nra-impeded-the-boston-bomber-investigation/

But for the NRA-backed policy of not putting identifiers known as taggants in gunpowder, law enforcement could have quickly identified the explosives used to make the bombs, tracking them from manufacture to retail sale. That could well have saved the life of Sean Collier, the 26-year-old MIT police officer who was gunned down Thursday night by the fleeing bomb suspects.

snip

Had the Boston bombers used a plastic explosive, it would have included identifiers that would have allowed a quick trace. Those taggants exist because the NRA does not oppose them.

Why is that? Why this breach in the NRA’s Maginot Line of defense against reasonable regulation of guns and ammunition?

The answer appears to lie in who makes plastic explosives like Semtx, which was used to bring down Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988. The world’s main supplier was not a company that finances the NRA, but Libya under Moammar Khadafy.

That this one breach in NRA policy traces directly to the economic interests of the American munitions industry provides powerful evidence of what motivates the NRA – profits.