DMI/ADX consistently works

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by nyc-hotshot, Aug 22, 2003.

  1. Stok

    Stok

    Is it possible that nyc's ADX is actually an ADX with only a 1 period MA. Since ADX is a moving average of DX, making it 1 period would just be the true DX? Still again, WarEagle, I think you are already doing that....but maybe we are getting close.
     
    #211     Sep 25, 2003
  2. Stok

    Stok

    #212     Sep 25, 2003
  3. AsaFce

    AsaFce

    The multiplication by one hundred doesn't matter since this scale is of percentages of 1 - it would just force it to a scale of 0-100 instead of 0-1.

    It still needs the absolute value in that calcuation since we aren't noting any direction, just strength.

    That said, I have been trying a variety of different moving averages and incorrect ADX calculations, including the one above, in an Excel spreadsheet and I'm still not getting what it gets on screen.

    It is very close to just having straight up DX.

    Either way if it works on that system, it is good to know - I will try to find some time to test that system to see if I can get it to work for me.
     
    #213     Sep 25, 2003
  4. No problem Rock, I was not referring to you anyway. Also, I don't mind debate on the subject. That's what the boards are for. From what you said I assume you are right and the indicator is probably DX not ADX. I can accept that.

    It is the people who made stupid allegations about me "spamming" and others who said they "seriously question" things I'm saying. That is just annoying and uncalled for. I am no technical or math wizard, and I have never professed to be. I am a trader, who has day traded since 1996, and has made good money.

    I just wanted to share what works for me (charts, trades, etc...) and let people make their own determinations about whether it will work for them. I think if you don't spell out every little detail, then some poeple think you are full of it, but the charts don't lie.
     
    #214     Sep 25, 2003
  5. WarEagle

    WarEagle Moderator

    Stok,

    Yeah, in that formula you gave, the *100 won't really matter except for where the decimal is. The absolute value is used to keep the values above zero. If you plot the one without the absolute value, you will get a line that fluctuates around zero. nyc's DX line does not go negative, so it is using absolute value in the calculation. Thanks for the heads up though.
     
    #215     Sep 25, 2003
  6. AsaFce

    AsaFce

    I've downloaded a demo of the realfasttrader/speedtrader software and I can't figure out how to get the ADX(DX?)/DMI info on screen - is it no longer available in the demo version?
     
    #216     Sep 25, 2003
  7. I don't use absolute value when I caculate ADX. I just do:

    DX = (pdi - mdi) / (pdi + mdi)
    ADX = emov(DX)

    Seems to be correct to me, FWIW. Can't remember where I original came across the formula, but that's what it was.
     
    #217     Sep 25, 2003
  8. AsaFce

    AsaFce

    So you are saying that you have no qualms with there being a negative DX value?

    I've seen an example of it on I think optionstrader.com or something that didn't have the absolute value reference in there, but it seems an oversight to me.

    It is a directional indicator, and the name (pdi - plus, mdi - minus) denotes the direction. The value is solely the strength.

    Meaning that you shouldn't see a negative number.

    Much in the same way that you can't drive negative 55mph.
     
    #218     Sep 25, 2003
  9. OK, I take that back. I just went back and looked at my source. I do take the ABS of the numerator. The denominator is always positive, so that one doesn't need it. My bad.
     
    #219     Sep 25, 2003
  10. Stok

    Stok

    Yeah...if you don't use AV you will get negative values.

    Example

    DM+ = .10
    DM- = .20

    Formula:

    DX = (.10-.20) / (.10+.20) will give you -.10/.30 - thats a neg #.

    LOL, this whole thing is kinda funny, because nyc's methods look awesome to me and it might come from a funky ADX line this is programmed wrong/differently or something.....gonna try to keep working on it as well guys.

    Stok
     
    #220     Sep 25, 2003